SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Elroy who wrote (279848)3/13/2006 2:41:53 PM
From: SilentZ  Respond to of 1573996
 
>This unsated thirst for land has caused Israeli leaders of all parties to state repeatedly that Israel would never return to its pre-1967 borders, although those borders gave Israel 78 per cent of the historic Palestine, leaving a mere 22 per cent to the Palestinians.

I'm pretty sure this isn't right, because historic Palestine included what is now Jordan. But Israel proper is something like 78% of Israel + the territories.

>The dispossessed Palestinians and indeed the entire Arab world were ready to accept this division. In a historic resolution, Arab leaders meeting in Beirut in March 2002 offered Israel peace and normal relations if it withdrew to its 1967 borders, but the offer was rejected.

It wasn't rejected because of borders, it was rejected because it included the "right of return," which, rightly or wrongly, will never be accepted by Israel.



To: Elroy who wrote (279848)3/14/2006 2:19:29 PM
From: tejek  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1573996
 
Here's the 1947 partition between Israel and Palestine as proposed by the UN:

trumanlibrary.org

Please note that Jerusalem was well into the middle of the proposed Arab state.