SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : ahhaha's ahs -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: JayPC who wrote (7693)3/13/2006 3:28:05 PM
From: GraceZRead Replies (1) | Respond to of 24758
 
For sure, going somewhere in a physical way to observe something remote is sooooo 20th century.



To: JayPC who wrote (7693)3/13/2006 4:23:22 PM
From: ahhahaRead Replies (2) | Respond to of 24758
 
Just set up an inverse tachyon beam routed through your forward

Tachyons don't exist and neither do worm holes. Wormish holes exist though, but only in an abstract modelling sense. All races use gravity drives. Gravity can be used in a certain mode to collapse the continuum between distant objects, and this can be modelled as a wormhole when actually it's more of a worm holish thinning of space perpendicular to the direction of travel. Take that Alcubierre. Our inertial rockets can travel faster than alien spacecraft.



To: JayPC who wrote (7693)3/13/2006 9:26:27 PM
From: Ron DiorRead Replies (1) | Respond to of 24758
 
<Just set up an inverse tachyon beam routed through your forward array, launch an anti-matter spread and you will be able to detect it.>

Just got back from a trip the other day and decided to come online and catch up.

Am I on the right thread??? Aliens? Tachyon beams? Prime Directive?

How do you go from “War on Wealth” to a Star Trek convention in a matter of a week?