Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (279956)	3/13/2006 6:25:26 PM
From: TigerPaw	Respond to of 1572702

It didn't become consentual, it always was consentual.

To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (279956)	3/13/2006 7:08:05 PM
From: Road Walker	Respond to of 1572702

re: A man in power, a naive starstruck girl, seems like just the situation feminists want to prevent. Of course, it was their man caught with his pants down, so now it becomes "consentual." Just like Hillary "consenting" to let her husband do all that. Oh wait, that's "private." Funny how "consent" and "privacy" are subject to double-standards ... Funny how it's none of your (or my) business.

To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (279956)	3/13/2006 8:29:29 PM
From: Amy J	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1572702

No, most feminists realize that when they told to choose between a bad apple or a rotten apple, their only option is to support the bad apple. That's how inequitable the conditions are for women. That's the second time I've said this - do you have a problem with memory or a problem with being educated on the fact that women do not have many options when it comes to govt political leaders: It should be crystal clear to you that women are given horrible options when it comes to Presidential leaders that arise from an essentially only male-dominated system.