Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : ahhaha's ahs -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Ron Dior who wrote (7730)	3/13/2006 10:12:01 PM
From: ahhaha	Respond to of 24758

Is the idea of a “higher being” and "creation" to simplistic to make the discussion? "higher being" can't be defined. Intelligence includes itself. No alien civilization has ever been able to create a thinking being. The beings they do create are just elaborate automatons. Be that as it may their automatons are far more intelligent than any humans. Must be that organic life has a property that be emulated in process. It's something like the ability to make error. This thought would end all speculation on how things got here and put more emphasis on why? You can't apply a "why" within the physical universe about the physical universe. This claim can be made rigorous and is equivalent to the undecidability theorems of metamathematics. Can't swallow your own tail. 'How' tries to explain the past but gives no insight as to the future. Scary. Consider that 'crats still exist after 40 years of false ideas that have brought nothing but trouble. What have they learned? Nothing. They want socialism, things like universal health care, while all the rest of the world tries to get rid of it. Notice no one ever mentions this this point except me? What have GM's and F's union learned over the last 30 years? Nothing. They have no intention of getting competitive. Both of these examples do give a view of the future though. It's like King Yudisthira's vision of hell.