Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Road Walker who wrote (280052)	3/14/2006 9:19:25 AM
From: combjelly	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 1575120

"If they suspect a woman might get an abortion, why not just lock her up in jail cell, without access to hangers." What they will do is set up border checkpoints. If a woman comes through the checkpoint with tampons in their purse or baggage, they will be arrested on suspicion of having gotten an abortion... Note: this actually used to happen on the borders between Germany and countries who had a more liberal view of abortion.

To: Road Walker who wrote (280052)	3/15/2006 9:50:41 PM
From: Amy J	Respond to of 1575120

The new twist is, they would make it illegal to save the life of a women. Reread it - they intentionally excluded a life clause. I'd like to read the names of the 18 men that make it illegal to save the life of a mother - they support murdering a mother. On a separate note, it can cost a couple of million to support a severely medically handicapped child. It cost $1.5 million for my Dad to be in the hospital for only 6 months on life support. Imagine having a child "live" this way for their entire life, if the doctors know this is the way the child will always live for its entire life then that would be cruel and unusual punishment. On a different note, Ohio would bankrupt themselves with such a law.