SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: GROUND ZERO™ who wrote (731850)3/14/2006 8:41:20 AM
From: DuckTapeSunroof  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 769670
 
Eh?

The Soviets invaded in December 1979... Christmas 1979, Russian paratroopers landed in Kabul. The country was already in the grip of a civil war.

The Mujahdeen proved to be a formidable opponent. They were equipped with old rifles but had a knowledge of the mountains around Kabal and the weather conditions that would be encountered there. The Russians resorted to using napalm, poison gas and helicopter gun ships against the Mujahdeen - but they experienced the same military scenario as Americans had faced in Vietnam.

...Mikhail Gorbachev took Russia out of the Afghanistan fiasco when he realised what many Russian leaders had been too scared to admit in public - that Russia could not win the war and the cost of maintaining such a vast force in Afghanistan was crippling Russia's already weak economy.

By the end of the 1980's, the Mujahdeen was at war with itself in Afghanistan with hard line Taliban fighters taking a stronger grip over the whole nation and imposing very strict Muslim law on the Afghanistan population.

historylearningsite.co.uk

The Role of Afghanistan in the fall of the USSR

In establishing the parameters, one could not put a price on the casualties, however it is necessary to apply some numerical figures into it. In fighting the Soviets the Afghans suffered about two million dead (mostly civilian), an economic devastation, over five million displaced citizens, and such political and social disintegration that the very future survival of Afghanistan as a state is still questionable. The war, for the Soviets without much exaggeration, meant nothing less then national suicide, even if one counts Afghanistan as a catalyst for the breakup process of the Soviet Union.

Economically speaking, the cost of the war varies, according to the varying Soviet figures, but the most agreeable figure is given as $8.2 billion per year. As for casualties, it too is an arguable topic, due to the strict censorship of the Soviet Union. The official 15,000 dead is a gross underestimation. Experts agree that at least 40,000 - 50,000 Soviets lost their lives in action, besides the wounded, suicides, and murders. The ultimate political cost, however, was at least the breakup of the surface glaze which had hidden much of the internal decay for decades.

afghan-web.com

Of course... this was the *second* time Russia had tried to conquer Afghanistan. The Tsar tried it in 1884, the 'Russo-Afghan War of 1885:

onwar.com



To: GROUND ZERO™ who wrote (731850)3/14/2006 12:23:32 PM
From: Karen Lawrence  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 769670
 
They invaded in '79 and withdrew troops TEN years later in '89. During the 15 years prior to invasion '55 to '79, Afghanistan had a Marxist government. afghan-web.com