Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: neolib who wrote (183535)	3/15/2006 9:20:16 AM
From: michael97123	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 281500

This is not my area of expertise but arent you confusing creationism with ID? Personally i like to believe in ID even though there are few signs in today's world that the creator(s) werent just a bunch of ex-catskill comics. What a world.

To: neolib who wrote (183535)	3/16/2006 7:42:11 PM
From: Brumar89	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 281500

Behe and Dembski are the two biggest names in ID and what they say below sounds pretty consistent with theistic evolution, doesn't it? Michael Behe: "I am an evolutionist in the sense that I do think natural selection explains many things ... But from what I see, the evidence only shows natural selection explaining rather small changes ... If is fine by me if common descent is true, and there is some sort of designed program to power changes over time ..."; William Dembski: "Right now I'm inclined toward a preprogrammed form of evolution in which life evolves teleologically ..". BTW, theistic evolution is contrary to the science as taught. Only natural causes powering evolution are kosher with the theory as it is taught.