SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : TATRADER GIZZARD STUDY--Stocks 12.00 or Less..... -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: TATRADER who wrote (53746)3/15/2006 9:41:25 AM
From: paret  Respond to of 59879
 
" as long as I can continue to run the marathon, I won't get worked up with missing a sprint..."



To: TATRADER who wrote (53746)3/15/2006 9:48:58 AM
From: lexi2004  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 59879
 
Anyone interested in intraday fibs on GNBT and NVAX...

NVAX...

.382 = 6.62
.50 = 6.55
.618 = 6.48

GNBT

.382 = 2.39
.50 = 2.35
.618 = 2.32

Lexi



To: TATRADER who wrote (53746)3/15/2006 3:36:55 PM
From: lexi2004  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 59879
 
NVAX..Bought trading shares today at .01 above the 50% intraday fib...@ 6.56. Just sold those at 6.96 due to having to leave to go to dentist.

Still holding IRA shares.

Lexi



To: TATRADER who wrote (53746)3/16/2006 3:29:24 AM
From: GTC Trader  Respond to of 59879
 
<< NVAX - I firmly believe that NVAX is headed for 7.50, 8.50, 9.50, and beyond, but not right away... >>

Mark,

FWIW, looking at the 2yr chart,
bigcharts.marketwatch.com
I see a HnS bottom from 1 to 6, projecting a target of 11.

The 10yr chart
bigcharts.marketwatch.com
tells me that 9 and 11 are key levels.

I may sell a third or two in hopes of buying back cheaper, but I'll hold a third or two for the target at 11.

BTW, NVAX doubled from 3 to 6 in 7 trading days. Might it duplicate that pattern and double from 6 to 12 in ~7 trading days?

Wheel sea ...

Ken



To: TATRADER who wrote (53746)3/16/2006 8:35:43 AM
From: lexi2004  Respond to of 59879
 
Mark,

I do believe this is the first time I've seen an article discussing Volume by Price, something we both use:

Message 22265388

Lexi