To: zx who wrote (29016 ) 3/19/2006 3:08:04 AM From: tsigprofit Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 48463 OLGC - no, I sold out of that in late November, too early as it turns out, but I made a small profit on it then - about 10% on the October to November run last year. Haven't had it since. Haven't started another position since this big plunge, but that might not be a bad idea. Saw this when reading about it today after I saw your post: Making matters worse, this was the company's only advanced clinical study currently under way. OrthoLogic is working on a formulation of Chrysalin for the treatment of diabetic wounds, and it recently acquired a preclinical compound that might be useful in vasospasm, the prevention of keloid scarring, and asthma -- but both of those compounds are many years away from approval (assuming they work). The good news, such as it is, is that OrthoLogic has a pretty decent chunk of cash on the balance sheet. Presuming, for the moment, that the company will abandon studies of Chrysalin in fracture care, it should have at least a few years of cash burn before it would have to raise money again. On the down side, I'm not sure there's much for investors to look forward to -- aside, perhaps, from the initiation of clinical studies on a gel formulation of Chrysalin for foot ulcers (and eventual results of such studies). Not to beat a dead horse, or a half-dead company, but here again we're reminded of the risks of one-trick biotech ponies -- other examples are Axonyx (Nasdaq: AXYX) and Pharmos (Nasdaq: PARS). Biotech investing is hard enough on its own, so don't make it even harder by depending upon risky concepts. Instead, look for stocks like Neurocrine Biosciences (Nasdaq: NBIX), DOV Pharmaceuticals (Nasdaq: DOVP), and Acadia (Nasdaq: ACAD) to enjoy the fruits of companies with multiple irons in the fire.fool.com