SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Jim McMannis who wrote (280412)3/16/2006 2:26:34 AM
From: Amy J  Respond to of 1573922
 
BEIJING - President Hu Jintao has a message for Chinese: "Uphold science; don't be ignorant and unenlightened."

news.yahoo.com

Can't imagine Bush every upholding science. USA is screwed.



To: Jim McMannis who wrote (280412)3/16/2006 3:31:12 PM
From: Taro  Respond to of 1573922
 
In that case USA may be on the way out as well.

Taro



To: Jim McMannis who wrote (280412)3/19/2006 1:48:00 PM
From: steve harris  Respond to of 1573922
 
Bradley playing like the old Arkansas. 40 minutes of hell and Pitt doesn't know what to do.

Good stuff.



To: Jim McMannis who wrote (280412)3/21/2006 6:46:39 AM
From: Road Walker  Respond to of 1573922
 
Agent blames FBI for blocking investigation before Sept. 11TERRORISM:The Minnesota-based agent said his superiors turned down many requests to search Zacarias Moussaoui's belongings and laptop computer.BY STEWART M. POWELLHEARST NEWSPAPERSALEXANDRIA, Va. -- With precious days slipping away and the 19 al-Qaeda hijackers relentlessly moving into position to strike, FBI headquarters repeatedly thwarted an FBI field agent's effort to investigate arrested hijack suspect Zacarias Moussaoui and alert the nation to the possibility of a catastrophic attack, according to the field agent's testimony Monday.
FBI Special Agent Harry Samit arrested Moussaoui 26 days before the attacks. He accused his FBI superiors of "criminal negligence" as he outlined a heartbreaking chronology of foiled opportunities to unravel the al-Qaeda plot between the time Moussaoui was arrested on an immigration violation outside the Residence Inn in Eagan, Minn., and the Sept. 11 attacks.
FBI headquarters in general -- and FBI Supervisory Agent Mike Maltbie in particular -- stymied efforts by the FBI's Minnesota office to search Moussaoui's belongings and laptop computer. The FBI headquarters also blocked a plan to surreptitiously assign an Arabic-speaking law enforcement officer to the cell adjacent to Moussaoui in hopes of picking up information from the French citizen of Moroccan descent, Samit testified.
Frustrated FBI agents in Minneapolis finally settled on a plan to escort Moussaoui to France as part of deportation proceedings to enable French authorities to examine the contents of Moussaoui's belongings upon arrival in France in hopes of determining why Moussaoui paid $8,300 cash for flight simulator training on a Boeing 747 simulator when he didn't even have a pilot's license, Samit said.
Samit said that his superiors at FBI headquarters, led by Maltbie, even quibbled over which federal agency would pay for Moussaoui's flight to France. The final authorization for the flight didn't come until Sept. 10.
"You tried to move heaven and earth to get someone to look into this man's belongings," court-appointed defense lawyer Edward MacMahon said. "You were obstructed in every way."
"Yes sir, I was obstructed," Samit replied.
Samit answered questions during more than five hours of cross examination. Samit acknowledged that he had accused superiors at FBI headquarters of "obstructionism, criminal negligence and careerism" for blocking so many promising avenues to investigate Moussaoui after his arrest.
Samit said FBI headquarters thwarted "a serious opportunity to stop the 9/11 attacks."
MacMahon elicited testimony from Samit showing that Maltbie voiced such doubts about Moussaoui's identity that he even had FBI agents at the U.S. Embassy in Paris scour Paris telephone books to determine whether there was more than one Zacarias Moussaoui in France.
Special Agent Richard Kolko, an FBI spokesman, declined substantive comment on Samit's allegations. "It is obviously an ongoing trial being run by the Department of Justice," Kolko said. "We respect what occurs in the courtroom and withhold any comment until after all the proceedings are completed."
Samit said Maltbie had been such a chronic "obstructionist" to field agents seeking warrants that the FBI supervisor delayed for nine months Samit's 2000 bid to check on a Taliban terrorist trainer heading to Afghanistan who had a relative trying to enlist in the Minnesota National Guard. Samit said Maltbie initially blocked his efforts to alert the Army about the recruit's ties to a Taliban terrorist trainer.
Samit said he tried to alert Washington in a 25-page high-priority "electronic communication" on Aug. 18, 2001, that Moussaoui had told investigators shortly after his Aug. 16 arrest that he had plans to visit the Statute of Liberty, the Empire State Building and the White House. Samit told superiors that he suspected Moussaoui was training on a simulator to hijack a plane, that the knives he was carrying signaled an intention to disable an airline crew and that he had a desire to use the hijacked aircraft "to his own ends."
But Samit said his investigative conclusions regarding the White House were drained from the cable that FBI headquarters relayed to U.S. Secret Service headquarters.
Samit added: "Any part of the United States that Mr. Moussaoui was interested in was of grave concern to me."
Samit recalled that FBI Supervisory Agent Greg Jones in Minneapolis fruitlessly tried to energize Maltbie to help obtain search warrants in a heated telephone call by insisting that FBI field agents were merely "trying to prevent Zacarias Moussaoui from flying a plane into the World Trade Center."
Samit said Jones' citation of the World Trade Center was drawn out of thin air, because there was no evidence at that point that Moussaoui or anyone else had a plan in place to strike the towers. Samit said he asked Jones later why he had chosen to mention the World Trade Center.
"It was just a lucky guess," Jones replied, according to Samit's testimony.
Samit also said FBI headquarters thwarted his efforts to alert Federal Aviation Administration headquarters about Moussaoui, forcing him to meet face-to-face with FAA counterparts in Minneapolis to brief them on his suspicions.
"You fought the good fight," an intelligence agency employee identified only as "Cathy" e-mailed Samit on Sept. 10, 2001 -- the day before al-Qaeda hijackers drove four commandeered commercial airliners into the World Trade Center, the Pentagon and a field in western Pennsylvania. "God help us if the next terrorist incident involves the same type of plane (as the Boeing 747 that Moussaoui was training to fly)."
The proceedings stem from Moussaoui's guilty plea last April 22 to six charges arising from the Sept. 11 attacks, leaving jurors to decide whether he should face execution or life imprisonment. Moussaoui claims he was not part of the Sept. 11 plot, having been sent by terrorist mastermind Osama bin Laden for a second wave of attacks that never took place.
The FBI's actions between Moussaoui's arrest and the Sept. 11 attacks are crucial because prosecutors say that Moussaoui prevented authorities from uncovering the Sept. 11 plot.
MacMahon argued that Moussaoui never fooled Samit.
To obtain a death penalty, prosecutors must prove that Moussaoui's actions led directly to the death of at least one person during the Sept. 11 attacks.



To: Jim McMannis who wrote (280412)3/24/2006 9:02:48 AM
From: Road Walker  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1573922
 
Let's see, what's unique about Hawaii? Could it be that wages and benefits going up has a relationship with low illegal immigration (it's a long swim from Mexico to Hawaii)? What would be happening to wages and benefits in the lower 48 without illegal immigration?

Hawaii Boasts Lowest Jobless Rate in U.S.
By MARK NIESSE, Associated Press Writer

Hawaii could almost change its state motto to "Help Wanted." "Now hiring" signs decorate storefront windows. Some companies entice with flexible scheduling. First Hawaiian Bank has doubled its hiring bonus to $500 besides offering gym memberships, tuition reimbursements and medical spending programs.

At 2.4 percent, Hawaii's unemployment rate for January, the most recent figure available, is the lowest in the country. The national average, which was 4.7 percent in January, rose to 4.8 percent in February, according to the Labor Department.

In other words, it's a great environment for those seeking work on the islands, said Beth Busch, president of Success Advertising Hawaii, which organizes several job fairs each year.

"If they want a job in this market, they could have one," Busch said.

Workers are in such high demand that businesses are offering better salaries, more benefits and extra overtime pay.

Joelle Branch, a 27-year-old single mother, found a job that allows her to have Tuesdays and Thursdays off so she can attend university classes, and she's already received a raise.

"I was looking for something that would help me make my schedule around school and allow me to find time with my son," said Branch, who was hired in August as an office assistant for George's Aviation Services in Honolulu.

Jamba Juice, which is rapidly expanding its smoothie outlets in the islands, offers a $10,000 bonus to store managers who stay on the job for three years.

"It's a continuous challenge to attract and retain workers," said Iris Matsumoto, senior vice president for human resources at First Hawaiian Bank. "Everyone is tweaking their programs and being more creative."

Hawaii's unemployment rate is at its lowest level since January 1991, according to the state Department of Labor and Industrial Relations. There are only 15,300 people unemployed out of 645,700 in the total labor force.

No other state comes close to its unemployment rate. The next lowest are Florida and Virginia, at 3 percent each, while Mississippi has the highest jobless rate, at 8.4 percent.

But job hunters may want to think twice before relocating to Hawaii. Travel to anywhere beyond the islands is expensive, property values and rents are sky-high, and with a bustling economy and job market come worsening traffic, pricey lunch options and few places to get away from crowds of tourists.

On the other hand, businesses are willing to pay people higher salaries to compensate for the cost disadvantages of the island lifestyle.

"They look at it as, `We're running out of workers,'" said Tom Smyth, senior adviser for the state Department of Business, Economic Development and Tourism. "The hotels need more people, the buses need more drivers, the stores need more clerks."

Even starting pay at most fast-food restaurants is above the minimum wage, ranging between $7 and $12 an hour.

When times are this good, laid-off workers are suddenly in demand. For example, the Sheraton Hotels in Waikiki have been recruiting some of the 700 Del Monte pineapple workers who will lose their jobs by the time the company stops its Hawaii operations in 2008.

"It's just really challenging to get workers now," said company spokeswoman Candice Kraughto. "We always have positions available, but we're filling them very quickly."

Most of the open jobs are in construction, retail, transportation, utilities, leisure, hospitality, education and health, according to the state Labor Department.

Over the next few years, Hawaii's strong economy is expected to continue on its fast pace, said Paul Brewbaker, chief economist for the Bank of Hawaii. That will open even more jobs.

Companies will be forced to offer+ better wages, and then those costs will be passed on to consumers in higher prices, he said. Eventually, that inflationary pressure puts a drag on economic growth.

"Can we keep it running this hot?" Brewbaker asked. "We seem to be in a fairly resilient kind of mode. ... I think we'll pull it out until 2008. With a little luck, maybe beyond."

___

On the Net:

University of Hawaii Economic Research Organization: uhero.hawaii.edu

Hawaii Department of Labor: hawaii.gov



To: Jim McMannis who wrote (280412)3/27/2006 7:01:00 AM
From: Road Walker  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 1573922
 
Good op-ed, but he still misses the real solution... fully prosecute the employers of illegal immigrants:

North of the Border
By PAUL KRUGMAN
"Give me your tired, your poor, your huddled masses yearning to breathe free," wrote Emma Lazarus, in a poem that still puts a lump in my throat. I'm proud of America's immigrant history, and grateful that the door was open when my grandparents fled Russia.

In other words, I'm instinctively, emotionally pro-immigration. But a review of serious, nonpartisan research reveals some uncomfortable facts about the economics of modern immigration, and immigration from Mexico in particular. If people like me are going to respond effectively to anti-immigrant demagogues, we have to acknowledge those facts.

First, the net benefits to the U.S. economy from immigration, aside from the large gains to the immigrants themselves, are small. Realistic estimates suggest that immigration since 1980 has raised the total income of native-born Americans by no more than a fraction of 1 percent.

Second, while immigration may have raised overall income slightly, many of the worst-off native-born Americans are hurt by immigration — especially immigration from Mexico. Because Mexican immigrants have much less education than the average U.S. worker, they increase the supply of less-skilled labor, driving down the wages of the worst-paid Americans. The most authoritative recent study of this effect, by George Borjas and Lawrence Katz of Harvard, estimates that U.S. high school dropouts would earn as much as 8 percent more if it weren't for Mexican immigration.

That's why it's intellectually dishonest to say, as President Bush does, that immigrants do "jobs that Americans will not do." The willingness of Americans to do a job depends on how much that job pays — and the reason some jobs pay too little to attract native-born Americans is competition from poorly paid immigrants.

Finally, modern America is a welfare state, even if our social safety net has more holes in it than it should — and low-skill immigrants threaten to unravel that safety net.

Basic decency requires that we provide immigrants, once they're here, with essential health care, education for their children, and more. As the Swiss writer Max Frisch wrote about his own country's experience with immigration, "We wanted a labor force, but human beings came." Unfortunately, low-skill immigrants don't pay enough taxes to cover the cost of the benefits they receive.

Worse yet, immigration penalizes governments that act humanely. Immigrants are a much more serious fiscal problem in California than in Texas, which treats the poor and unlucky harshly, regardless of where they were born.

We shouldn't exaggerate these problems. Mexican immigration, says the Borjas-Katz study, has played only a "modest role" in growing U.S. inequality. And the political threat that low-skill immigration poses to the welfare state is more serious than the fiscal threat: the disastrous Medicare drug bill alone does far more to undermine the finances of our social insurance system than the whole burden of dealing with illegal immigrants.

But modest problems are still real problems, and immigration is becoming a major political issue. What are we going to do about it?

Realistically, we'll need to reduce the inflow of low-skill immigrants. Mainly that means better controls on illegal immigration. But the harsh anti-immigration legislation passed by the House, which has led to huge protests — legislation that would, among other things, make it a criminal act to provide an illegal immigrant with medical care — is simply immoral.

Meanwhile, Mr. Bush's plan for a "guest worker" program is clearly designed by and for corporate interests, who'd love to have a low-wage work force that couldn't vote. Not only is it deeply un-American; it does nothing to reduce the adverse effect of immigration on wages. And because guest workers would face the prospect of deportation after a few years, they would have no incentive to become integrated into our society.

What about a guest-worker program that includes a clearer route to citizenship? I'd still be careful. Whatever the bill's intentions, it could all too easily end up having the same effect as the Bush plan in practice — that is, it could create a permanent underclass of disenfranchised workers.

We need to do something about immigration, and soon. But I'd rather see Congress fail to agree on anything this year than have it rush into ill-considered legislation that betrays our moral and democratic principles.