Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Don't Blame Me, I Voted For Kerry -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Dan B. who wrote (74552)	3/17/2006 4:30:26 PM
From: American Spirit	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 81568

Man, you are dense if you believe that BS about Atta and the Iraqis. That is the least credible piece of garbage Cheney ever uttered. Saddam hated and feared Al Qaida. Him teaming up with them would be like Marilyn Manson teaming up with Pat Robertson. Both nuts, but on opposite ends of the religious spectrum. Who do you think filled Saddam's mass graves? Islamic fundamentalists mostly. Cheney is a bald-faced intentional liar for repeating that debunked story. I told you, I saw it debunked the day it came out in the Prague Post. Look it up. Not a shred of truth to it whatsoever. Completely baseless. And you have no reason to believe it except blind allegiance to proven liar Cheney.

To: Dan B. who wrote (74552)	3/20/2006 1:28:44 AM
From: Orcastraiter	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 81568

Dan, George Tenet said the meeting could not be confirmed and that he was increasingly skeptical that a meeting took place. He said that on March 9th 2004. The rumor started on an unconfirmed tip of an eyewitness sighting. Ruzek of the BIA, Czech intelligence, said the information was raw unvetted hearsay. He shared that raw info with the FBI. The rumor was leaked by an un-named US official to the news a week later. Ruzek was furious that this unvetted intelligence was released, as it completely screwed up his investigation of the case, and compromised his agents following the Iraqi Embassy. Further it can be assumed that the Iraqi Embassy was well aware they they were under surveillance...so why meet with someone so publicly who was involved in 9-11? That would defy logic. The meeting cannot be confirmed in any way shape or form. Why do you hold on so tight to this sliver of a fantasy? Orca