Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Sam who wrote (183742)	3/19/2006 1:27:41 AM
From: Hawkmoon	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 281500

No, because I don't accept the analogy to WWII. These are very different sorts of conflict. Yeah they are... Neither the Nazis, nor the Japanese, succeeded in killing 3,000 innocent American civilians on the US mainland. Pearl Harbor was located in a US territorial holding. The other difference is that not only did we defeat the country that harbored the Islamo-Fascists (Afghanistan), we chose to take a step necessary toward pressuring the other corrupt regimes in the region to stop supporting/tolerating Islamo-Fascist elements in their midst. Other than that.. the analogy is VERY similiar. Hawk