SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Mish's Global Economic Trend Analysis -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: NOW who wrote (48368)3/20/2006 12:44:01 AM
From: CalculatedRisk  Respond to of 116555
 
Bogus Bush Bashing, By Paul Krugman, Bogus W. Attacks Commentary, NY Times
select.nytimes.com

Excerpt:

Mr. Bush, of course, bears primary responsibility for the state of his presidency. But ... we're looking at the failure of a movement as well as a man. ... [M]ost of the conservatives now rushing to distance themselves from Mr. Bush still can't bring themselves to criticize his actual policies. Instead, they accuse him of policy sins — in particular, of being a big spender on domestic programs — that he has not, in fact, committed.

Before I get to the bogus issue of domestic spending, let's look at the policies the new wave of conservative Bush bashers refuses to criticize. Mr. Bush's new conservative critics don't say much about the issue that most disturbs the public, the quagmire in Iraq. That's not surprising. Commentators who acted as cheerleaders in the run-up to war, and in many cases questioned the patriotism of those of us who were skeptical, can't criticize the ... war without facing up to their own complicity in that decision. Nor, after years of insisting that things were going well in Iraq and denouncing anyone who said otherwise, is it easy for them to criticize Mr. Bush's almost surreal bungling of the war. ...

Meanwhile, the continuing allegiance of conservatives to tax cuts ... prevents them from saying anything about the real sources of the federal budget deficit, in particular Mr. Bush's unprecedented decision to cut taxes in the middle of a war. (My colleague Bob Herbert points out that the Iraq hawks chose to fight a war with other people's children. They chose to fight it with other people's money, too.)

More excerpts here:
economistsview.typepad.com



To: NOW who wrote (48368)3/20/2006 12:45:41 AM
From: CalculatedRisk  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 116555
 
Krugman is dead on. The problem with the Bush Administration is worse than incompetence ... its a problem of BAD ideas.

The Iraq blunder. The failed tax cuts. And more.



To: NOW who wrote (48368)3/20/2006 7:44:37 AM
From: Oblomov  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 116555
 
No, I don't regard Phillips as a conservative at all. Bartlett is an economic conservative or libertarian conservative. The Reagan Administration gave a lot of attention to libertarian ideas, while the GW Bush administration has clearly shunned them.