Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: combjelly who wrote (280913)	3/20/2006 3:03:32 PM
From: Amy J	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 1572894

No, it still doesn't make sense. People that procreate aren't immune to diseases. Having sex, whether for recreational or procreation reasons, boils down to risks. It's illogical to think procreationists have zero risks. A procreationist could unknowingly marry someone that was widowed to someone that had a sexually transmittable disease. It also suggests the ideology crowd doesn't like to plan for a potential scenario of reality, but would rather play in the world of imaginary. The fact is, 10,000 women get this every year - those are the facts. It amounts to having an agenda of murder towards women. This administration sounds even worse than the 50s. Have you considered that all of this weird stuff is a hint of something worse to happen to this country? Is it a hint that it's time to shift money to other forward-moving countries, just in case things take a turn for even worse?