SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Welcome to Slider's Dugout -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: SliderOnTheBlack who wrote (1331)3/20/2006 11:30:39 AM
From: roguedolphin  Respond to of 49990
 
Train Wreck of the Week
by Robert Chapman
March 18, 2006

The world’s central banks would have us believe that they will likely work closer together to try to manage the impact of an expected long-term decline in the value of the dollar. They have already been doing that for a very long time without telling you that. Trial balloons are going up preparing the public for the fall of the dollar. Preparation for what the bankers hope is a gradual shift in the dollar’s role as the world’s reserve currency over the next 4 to 6 years. The bankers know they’ve essentially ruined the American economy via debt, reflected in the current account, fiscal and personal indebtedness. They know dollar holdings eventually have to be liquidated even at a loss. They know US debt is unpayable, and they know for sure the dollar will lose its position as the world’s reserve currency. It has all been planned that way to clear a path for a universal world currency as part of a One World Government. The trick for the bankers is to dump dollars in a gradual manner so as to keep their losses to a minimum and they hope that can be done via coordination. What the bankers are not telling you is that they started dumping dollars five years ago. If you check BIS figures, which you received in the last issue, you see that dollar reserve holdings have dropped precipitously. The big holders are Asian central banks, the US and Caribbean banks that are fronting for Federal Reserve monetization. We can assure you British and other European central banks will extricate themselves in due time but Asian banks will get left holding the bag.

What is going to be pitched to you is that there must be coordination when in fact the coordination has already been taking place behind the scenes for years, just as the manipulation of all markets has been going on for years. Coordination is just another word for manipulation.

The trade figures came out a week ago and there was another surge in the trade deficit with China and the rest of the world. As a result, economic tensions are rising again in Washington as the Capital prepares for the long-delayed visit of President Hu Jintao in late April. The visit comes as there is increasing pressure to find some way to curb the growth of China’s exports, as protectionism finally becomes a factor in foreign policy. The deficit with China is increasing 10% a month. The January trade gap was $17.9 billion and overall we imported $68.5 billion more in goods and services than we exported. Our Treasury is supposedly trying to figure out if China is a currency manipulator. The answer is of course they are, and so is 95% of the rest of the world, including our treasury and Fed. Finally, forced by constituents, Congress is standing up to retaliate as reelection appears in the distance. They have had their wakeup call and they had better react. If they don’t they won’t be reelected. Dubai Ports has taught these immoral crooks a lesson. Congress and our President have sufficiently enraged the American public. Just look at the responses to questions on CNN’s Lou Dobbs show every weekday night. Politics create some very strange bedfellows. Lindsey Graham (R-SC) is an unprincipled lout and Charles Schumer (D-NY) has been wallowing at the bottom of the barrel for a long time, but you have to take what you can get. Remember, your enemy’s enemy is your friend whether you like it or not. They have sponsored pending legislation to impose a tariff of 27.5% on all Chinese imports unless Beijing allows its currency to appreciate. That would make Chinese goods that much more expensive in the US. The bill is short sighted – it should include all the currency manipulators well over 100 of them. Passage of such a bill would destroy WTO, NAFTA and CAFTA, which would suit us fine. Passage of such a bill would force China and others to allow their currencies to float and rise to a market level, but the flip side of that is they wouldn’t have to buy US Treasuries and keep dollar balances. That would mean the US government wouldn’t be able to fund its debt and the dollar would fall 30% to 50% in value against gold and some major currencies. There is a lot at stake here. The problem is whether we impose tariffs or not, the dollar is going down. This would just expedite the process. It would also eventually bring an end to free trade and we would no longer suffer the loss of our manufacturing economy, via offshoring and outsourcing, as it would be less attractive. Severe damage has been done to us by elitist transnational conglomerates, but at least the offshore flow of industry and jobs would cease. Remember, we have implemented tariffs since the creation of our nation and it’s one of the main reasons we prospered.

The half-wit in the White House with the 34% approval rating would probably veto such legislation. It is up to us to make sure that veto is overridden. This dear subscriber is the moment of truth economically for our nation. Incidentally, we believe other bills will arise before November. Tariffs, the occupation of Iraq and Afghanistan and illegal immigration will be the major issues that shape the results of the next election. Our President’s strength previously was his consistent 52% backing on Iraq and Afghanistan, that approval is now 43%. If an election were held today George W. Bush couldn’t be elected dogcatcher and Congress, especially Republicans, know that.

In another example of the duplicitous scum that inhabits Washington, last week we observed Jack Kemp on Meet the Press give all the reasons to back the Dubai Ports deal – most of which were conjecture or lies. What he failed to tell the audience was that the UAE has invested millions in Free Market Global, an energy trading company of which he is chairman. General Tommy Franks, whom Kemp used as his debate reference, is on the advisory board of Free Market Global, and stands to profit from maintaining good relations with the oil-rich emirs. Our nation’s capital is wallowing in scum. It’s all about money. Our sources tell us the Dubai Ports deal was really ramroded by Dick Cheney. All these elitists are interconnected and all of them are there for the money and power. Kemp might also have mentioned his close relationship Samir Vincent in the 21st Century Marshall Plan for Iraq, who was a player in the oil-for-food scandal and who pleaded guilty to illegally lobbying for Iraq. Vincent is a buddy of Frank Carlucci, Chairman Emeritus of the Carlyle Group, the elitists favorite private equity group that has received more than $100 million in funding from the UAE. We reported on Bill Clinton’s payoffs by the UAE last week. There were thousands of beneficiaries to the Dubai Ports deal and no one will now get paid. Let’s hear it for the American people and let’s hope congress turns on this issue and does what Americans want them to do.

The unfolding debit card scam that rocked Citibank last week is far from over. This is the first time ever mass theft of PINs, the worst consumer scam in history. It has forced Citibank to reissue debit cards and block PIN-based transactions for users in Canada, Russia and the UK. The scandal has hit Bank of America, Wells Fargo and Washington Mutual, as well as smaller banks, all of which had to re-issue debit cards in recent weeks. This is the worst hack in history. The thieves hacked into the system and made off with data stored on debt cards’ magnetic strips, the associated PIN blocks and the key for that encrypted data. The problem is that retailers improperly store PIN numbers after they have been entered, rather than erase them at the PIN-entering pad. Worse, the key to encrypt the PIN blocks are often stored on the same network as the PINs themselves, making a single successful hack a potential goldmine for criminals: they get the PIN data and the key to read it. This allowed the thieves to crank out counterfeit debit cards and they then emptied accounts at ATMs. They stole at least 200,000 records. The banks believe Office Max was penetrated. The answer is to use the debt card at the ATM and use cash to buy. The problem is at the point of sale so do not use your debt card at points of sale.

The fourth quarter of 2005 was a humdinger for the US credit system. Total Credit Market Debt was $3.827 trillion, up 10.1% versus the third quarter. Debt growth was up more than $500 billion compared to 2004’s record of $2,818 trillion. TCMD expanded $3.340 trillion in 2005 to $40.230 trillion. As a comparison Annual total Credit Market Debt growth averaged $1.237 during the 1990s. You would have to go back to 1986 to surpass 2005’s 9.5% rate of expansion in non-financial debt. At a record $2.295 trillion, non-financial debt expanded at more than three times the nineties average $710 billion. Total household borrowings expanded 11.7% during 2005, the largest since 1985. Total business debt expanded at the fastest pace 7.8% since 2000. State and local debt grew 10.6% during 2005 and government borrowings expanded 7.0%.

Total mortgage debt expanded an astounding $1.470 trillion in 2005, up 14%. That is five times the average annual mortgage debt growth during the 1990s. TMD ballooned 29% in just two years to $2.708 trillion, and more than doubled in seven years, up 107%. TMD increased to a record 96% of GDP during 2005, up from 67% to begin year 2000, and 51% in 1982. Household mortgage debt expanded a record $1.133 trillion, or 14.1%, up from 2004’s record $992 billion growth and the 90s average of $230 billion. Commercial mortgage debt expanded a record $266 billion, or 15.6% to $1.968 trillion. This is ten times the $26 billion nineties annual average commercial mortgage debt growth.

Financial sector credit market debt rose 8.2% from 2004’s 7.4%. Bank credit expanded 10.1%. That is a 2-year gain of 20.3%. Bank mortgages grew 14% and 31.1% for two years. Corporate bond holdings increased 22.8% and 43% in two years.

In structured finance growth was 8.1%. GSE contracted 2.3%, MBS was up 3.8%, but ABS was up 28% for the fourth quarter and 26.7% for the year to 43.059 trillion. ABS was up 46.5% for two years and 130% so far this decade. 70% of ABS holdings are mortgages up from 42% in 2002.

Securities broker/dealer assets rose to $299 billion, or 16.2% or a total of $2.144 trillion. Their assets rose 33% in two years and 61% in three years. Money markets grew for the first time since 2001, increasing $130 billion or 6.8% annually to $2.011 trillion.

Foreign holding of US financial assets surged $1.318 trillion to $11.154 trillion for a two-year gain of 33%. Of total credit market holdings the two-year gain was 42%. Treasury holdings increased $298 billion to $2.198 trillion, absorbing essentially all of 2005 issuance of $307 billion. Agency holdings vaulted $172 billion to $934 billion, significantly more than new agency debt issued during the year of $51 billion. We see this as market support. Corporate bond holdings rose $351 billion to $2.103 trillion while equities increased $86 billion to $2.304 trillion.

Household liabilities expanded 12.9% for the fourth quarter and increased $1.181 trillion, or 11.0% for the year to $11.916 trillion. Liabilities were up 24.1% in two years and 50.7% in four years. Assets surged $5.038 trillion, or 8.5% to a record $64.023 trillion. Real estate holdings jumped $2.803 trillion to 14.9%. They were up 57% in four years. Household net worth jumped $3.875 trillion to a record $52.107 trillion. That increase was down from a 2004 gain of $4.418 trillion. In three years net worth inflated by 33%. Net worth in 2005 was 417% of GDP, up from 1995s 351% and 1985’s 335%.

We are in an era where credit growth, current account deficits, leveraged speculation and derivatives do not matter. The Fed is deliberately destroying the financial system and it is being assisted by free trade and globalization. The result of the new paradigm will be like a nuclear explosion far beyond what anyone can imagine. De-leveraging internationally has begun with the end of the yen carry-trade. The only safe place from this insanity will be gold and silver related assets.

theinternationalforecaster.com.

Rogue



To: SliderOnTheBlack who wrote (1331)3/20/2006 11:40:49 AM
From: J.B.C.  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 49990
 
>>...as 99% of your posts on SI are purely political in nature -- are they not?<<

Not even close, in fact I more and more post on non political threads as evidenced by the same link you included. I bookmarked this thread as an investment thread it is not, it is Now a Bash Bush all the time thread, so it is now the ONLY political thread that I have bookmarked but not much longer.

How do you explain the global warming occurring on Mars? Have we (man) caused it?

Bush never ran on a platform of reducing spending and reducing government. However, I am a conservative, so I also have issues with some policy's of Bush.

>>They allowed America's future to be mortgaged away in return for the illusion of wealth via a "feel-good" Housing Bubble, "0% Financing" on their SUV's and Luxury Cars and Tax cuts for the investor class.<<

Bush didn't make folks take money out of their increasing property value to spend on their lifestyles, in fact this practice did not 1st occur with the Bush administration, in fact none of the practices of the US population are new events with the Bush administration. With the left why is it history began Jan 20th, 2001?

On the other hand, I've never participated in this practice of refinancing my home to buy toy's, have you? Did Bush make you do it?

The other day you posted an article on a national ID and added the scare threat that this was the "mark" of the Beast. Why? I didn't read anywhere where it asked you to Worship Bush as GOD and denounce Him? Is it common practice to use unsubstantiated scare tactics when a person doesn't like a policy? Yet, you also chastised the border control. Wouldn't a National ID help? I looked at the back of my "State" id (my Colorado Drivers license) It had a magnetic strip on it, OH-MY-GOSH! I also had my finger prints taken for my license. Bet you have the same thing in your state and didn't think twice. I didn't have to pledge my faith to Roy Romer, who was governor when I moved here, and I wasn't told to denounce my Christianity and put to death for remaining true to my faith.

Also, "most" cars do not track where you are as you alluded in another post. If you have a GM onstar, it does, if you have a car with GPS, it does, if you have a transponder for toll road payment, it does. All of these are optional, in fact you can go to a store and buy a GPS separate from your car, no registration of your name is required, so you can have GPS technology without having your nefarious activities tracked, just don't forget to turn OFF your cell phone ( I believe cell phones are still optional, aren't they?).

Here's an article for you to note that I agree with on principle about today's political climate, not necessarily just the subject that this particular article was written about.

************************************************************

For the Left, it's only democracy when they win

by Ben Shapiro
townhall.com
Mar 15, 2006

Last week, Gov. Mike Rounds of South Dakota signed legislation prohibiting abortion in the state except in cases where the mother's life is in danger. The bill passed in the South Dakota Senate, 23-12. It passed in the South Dakota House of Representatives with flying colors, 50-18. Members of both political parties voted for the bill; the bill's chief sponsor was Sen. Julie Bartling, a Democrat.

Naturally, Planned Parenthood has pledged its opposition to the law. Sarah Stoesz, CEO of Planned Parenthood in Minnesota, South Dakota and North Dakota, states that Planned Parenthood will gauge public feeling about the bill before choosing whether to litigate. "We haven't decided yet. We're trying to sort out our strategy," she explained.

For Planned Parenthood, this should be an easy decision: Either the law is unconstitutional, or it is not. If the law is unconstitutional, filing a lawsuit is the only systemically correct decision -- after all, the judiciary is supposedly the proper protector of individual rights. If the law is fully constitutional, it is disreputable to consider litigation as an alternative to the political process -- filing a lawsuit to overturn fully constitutional public decision-making you don't like is antithetical to our system of governance.

But this is what the American left has become: For the left, democratic processes are valid only when they win. If the left loses in the political process, they sue. The people are no longer integral to the process; politics is a heads-I-win-tails-I-sue scenario. When respect for the American people means so little that republicanism itself becomes secondary to certain political end-goals, our system of government is in serious trouble.

Yet if the past few years of politics teaches us anything, it is that for the political left, end-goals trump American democratic processes every time. "Democracy isn't democracy," the left argues, "unless we win." That has been the message of the Democratic left since the 2000 election. How often have we seen the slogan "NOT MY PRESIDENT" plastered across a picture of George W. Bush? How often have we seen radical leftists declare that Republicans routinely steal elections? How often have we seen MoveOn.org members compare President Bush to Adolf Hitler? How often have we heard prominent Democrats like John Kerry describe the Bush administration as a "regime"?

Republicanism cannot survive such all-out assault. The principle of majoritarianism requires that communal decisions be respected, even as minorities try to persuade majorities to change their policies. Constitutional laws created through a legitimate political process are not binding only for those who vote for those laws. When leftists refuse to accept that President Bush is their president regardless of whether they voted for John Kerry, they undermine American republicanism.

I don't like Senator Hillary Clinton (D-NY), and I wouldn't have voted for her were I a resident of New York. Nonetheless, she remains a U.S. Senator, and her vote in the Senate is just as legitimate as that of Senator George Allen (R-VA), with whom I generally agree. I didn't like Bill Clinton, and I wouldn't have voted for him. Nonetheless, he was my president. When President Kennedy was shot, Republicans and Democrats alike mourned. Americans mourned because Kennedy was our president. He was America's president, not Democrats' or Republicans'. The same was true of Clinton, and the same is true of George W. Bush.

I fear that today's left disagrees. Were President Bush assassinated, thousands of leftists the country over would pop open champagne before realizing that Vice President Cheney was next in line. Then they'd go to work attacking Cheney's legitimacy.

The American democratic process is worthy of respect, whether or not we like the results. It is worthy of respect because the American people are worthy of respect. The decisions Americans make through their political processes are legitimate as long as they are in concert with the Constitution. Today's left disagrees. Today's left agrees with the British headline the morning after the 2004 election: "How could 50 million people be so stupid?"

The American people are not too stupid to be trusted with important issues like abortion. They are not too stupid to be trusted with deciding who becomes president.

Last week, 2000 Democratic presidential candidate Al Gore told a Palm Beach County, Fla., audience, "I truly believe that American democracy faces a time of challenge and trials that are more serious than we have ever faced." Gore is right -- but it is he and those like Planned Parenthood that threaten the fabric of American republicanism.

Copyright © 2006 Creators Syndicate, Inc.

townhall.com



To: SliderOnTheBlack who wrote (1331)3/20/2006 1:19:41 PM
From: roguedolphin  Respond to of 49990
 
Actor Charlie Sheen calling 9/11 an "inside job" today and saying it is all Americans "patriotic duty" to keep asking hard questions to restore our "freedom and liberty" from tyrants that may be lurking within and beyond our government!!!

Listen to interview here....

infowars.com


Rogue



To: SliderOnTheBlack who wrote (1331)3/20/2006 3:44:26 PM
From: loantech  Respond to of 49990
 
No worry slider let's just see what happens if our spouses run the family checkbook like the current administration runs their budget. Maybe we don't have to be responsible either. <g>



To: SliderOnTheBlack who wrote (1331)3/20/2006 6:01:41 PM
From: Metacomet  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 49990
 
Excellent summary Slider....

And that just deals with what we know has already happened.

The real crime of this cabal of greedy whores will be the situation that our descendants will find themselves in when the bill becomes due for the legions of enemies these fools have created.

When the armies of those who have been maligned and slaughtered, in order to provide political cover for these idiots, move on fortress America, and they will, and our kids and their kids lack the economic wherewithal to defend themselves, having inherited a mere shell of the vibrant economy that was our birthright, until now.

That is the true crime of this century.

And those who refuse to see it are blithering idiots.....



To: SliderOnTheBlack who wrote (1331)3/21/2006 4:16:18 AM
From: roguedolphin  Respond to of 49990
 
Collapsing Presidency

A Collapsing Presidency
by Paul Craig Roberts
March 20, 2006
LINK: lewrockwell.com

The latest national survey by the Pew Research Center finds that President Bush’s support among the American people has fallen to 33%. Even more devastatingly, the survey finds that people’s most frequently used one-word description of President Bush is "incompetent."

The chief chaplain for the New York City Corrections Department told a Tucson audience that "the greatest terrorists in the world occupy the White House." Two years ago when New York Mayor Michael Bloomberg was suppressing demonstrations at the Republican National Convention, the chief chaplain would have been fired for his remarks, but not today.

Abroad among peoples who formerly looked to America for leadership, American atrocities in Iraq have created sympathy and support for the Iraqi resistance.

When the Bush administration gets in trouble, it turns to war, which has worked for it in the past. Thus, this past week there was live coverage of "Operation Swarmer," which occupied a solid day on CNN and Fox "News." The venerable Washington Monthly reports that the hyped "assault on Samarra" was nothing but a Potemkin operation – a set propaganda piece to demonstrate US military prowess and the battle-ready "new Iraqi army," only there were no insurgents in Samarra to battle. The much-hyped "Operation Swarmer" was a photo op for TV cameras as troops fired into empty desert.

One can imagine the thoughts in Bush’s mind: "Thank goodness I didn’t capture bin Laden. Maybe he will strike again and bail me out."

What is going to rescue Bush? Not the Republican Party. A few Republican congressmen, such as Walter Jones, are trying to get a debate going, but Republicans believe that they are stuck to the fate of their man. There is no one within the administration to turn Bush toward diplomacy and away from coercion.

Created on the principle that "you are with us or against us," Bush’s administration is all of one mind. They are all neocons. There are no real conservatives or traditional Republicans in the Bush administration. This is the first administration in my lifetime in which there is no debate. The absence of debate means there is no check on reckless and ill-advised policies and corrupt schemes.

Neocons don’t believe in debate. They specialize in slandering critics and stamping out debate. Dissent is not possible within the Bush administration, because dissent is equated with treason and anti-Americanism. "You are with us or against us." Increasingly, Republicans demonize their critics as "abettors of terrorism." The Republicans’ intolerance for debate makes many Americans uneasy about the real purpose of the $385 million detention camp that Halliburton is building in the US for the Bush administration.

Neocons don’t believe in diplomacy. They believe in coercion. Neocons denigrate diplomacy as the epitome of weakness. Neocons slap down diplomacy before it can rise. The Iranians offered talks, and neocon National Security Adviser Stephen Hadley immediately slapped down the offer as "simply a device by the Iranians to try to divert pressure that they are feeling." The Bush neocons are bent on war with Iran. They don’t want any talks. In their books, neocons have demonized Muslims in the same way that the Nazis demonized Jews. Demonization makes talks impossible.

On March 17, William Rivers Pitt declared Bush to be "deranged, disconnected, and dangerous." But what else to expect from a neocon administration that declares that it creates its own reality and mocks its critics for being "reality-based." Neocons insanely believe that American power can be used to recreate the world in America’s image. Neocons are dangerous because they really believe that the US can invade the Middle East, deracinate Islam, and install puppet governments.

These disconnected neocons are not shaken by facts or by results. Their evil eye falls on US field commanders and CIA analysts who declare that the US military is creating insurgents faster than it can kill them.

Creating your own reality means that when you cannot put down a resistance based in 5 million Iraqi Sunnis, you attack 70 million Iranians, who are allied with 15 million Iraqi Shia, Hizbollah in Lebanon, and Hamas in Palestine.

The Bush administration is sending every signal that it is determined to go to war with Iran. Will the rest of the world block the American aggression, or will the rest of the world decide that it is in the world’s best interest for the hubris-driven hegemon to exhaust itself in conflict in the Middle East?

A thank you to readers: I appreciate the support demonstrated by your anger at the neocon web site, Frontpage, for slandering me. But to put a different light on the matter, let me ask you, what would you think of me if I were praised by Frontpage? Isn’t it preferable to be denounced by the neocon brownshirts? What better secures my reputation?

Neocons are incapable of debate, because they don’t believe in it. Neocons rely on disinformation and deceit to impose their agenda.

Neocons do not believe in the US Constitution, civil liberties, the separation of powers, or the Geneva Conventions. According to published reports, President Bush described the Constitution as "a scrap of paper." Bush’s attorney general, vice president, and secretary of defense have openly defended the Bush administration’s practice of torture, violations of habeas corpus, and illegal spying. These high officials, in violation of their oath of office, have openly declared that Bush, as commander-in-chief, is above the law.

What American ever expected to see the safeguards against tyranny put in place by the Founding Fathers removed in the name of providing security against terrorists by a president who purports to believe in original intent?

Neocons are Jacobins. They are a foreign import and do not share our American values. Neocons are a grave danger to the United States and to the world. Neocons have led America into two gratuitous on-going wars that cannot be won, and they are determined to lead us into more wars. It is our duty to defend our country and to oppose these evil people.

LINK: lewrockwell.com

Rogue



To: SliderOnTheBlack who wrote (1331)3/22/2006 11:11:48 PM
From: SOROS  Respond to of 49990
 
Re: The DVD

Forget all the other problems and inconsistencies. Have you checked out the claim that in 2001, only one in a hundred cell calls might connect from a plane at that altitude? If this is absolutely true and can be confirmed, how could there be ZERO coverage of this in the mainstream media? How could any rational person say they believe any of the official story about that day? How could anyone, no matter how fearful or confused or unable to face scary truths be able to make excuses for the gov't that they trust? Someone, anyone tell me what is wrong here in America that 99% of the people are willing to turn a deaf ear to ANYTHING no matter how much the little bit of conscience they have left protests? If the cell phone thing is 100% accurate, then the people of this country are screwed and manipulated 100% controlled robots going forward, and they all admit it and don't care, and 200 or so airline passengers are pushing up daisies or being housed in the Ministry of Love.