Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: ManyMoose who wrote (161228)	3/22/2006 11:02:23 PM
From: Maurice Winn	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 793955

Maybe Yosemite isn't National Forest, but here's some comment I trust: jewishworldreview.com There have also been major blunders in fauna management on federal land. I bet I could make a profit with Yosemite too if I didn't have to compete to buy it and just had to cover costs or get a 10% return on some low assessed market value. Of course water should be sold to the highest bidder. Getting enough to drink is cheap enough. Water should be on the auction block like other commons natural resources. Water is only 1c a litre if produced by desalination, and it only takes 4 litres of drinking water a day [4c] to keep somebody going. It's not as though "poor" people wouldn't be able to buy water at 1c a litre wholesale price, say 10c a litre retail. 30c a day x 400 = $120 a year. Mqurice