Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : FREE AMERICA -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Karen Lawrence who wrote (112)	3/20/2006 2:29:20 PM
From: michael97123	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 14758

Objective One: Get Rid of Iraqi Weapons of Mass Destruction Threat: We achieved our objective long before the war. The main stated objective of the war was pointless. {MAY HAVE BEEN BUT EVERYONE WAS SHOCKED BY NO WMDS INCLUDING IRAQI GENERALS WHO IT HAS RECENTLY BEEN REVEALED HEARD IT DIRECTLY FROM SADDAM JUST BEFORE WAR) Objective Two: Liberate Iraq: If crime, insurgency, and sectarian/ethnic violence are all considered, security for the average Iraq is now worse than under Saddam Hussein. Iraqis are freer, but the new political freedom is essentially the freedom to vote for sectarian and ethnic divisions. Some progress to be sure, but much more limited than the Administration claims. It will be 2007-2008 at the earliest before stability can be established -- if it can. We essentially used a bull to liberate a china shop, without a meaningful plan to deal with the consequences. We have tried to fix the resulting problems, but we still don't know whether we can salvage our early mistakes, and give Iraqis both real security and real freedom.,/b> bolded is where you are spot on Objective Three: End the Terrorist Threat in Iraq: There was no meaningful threat in the first place. Neo-Salafi terrorism now dominates the insurgency and is a far worse threat. Al-Qaida now has serious involvement in Iraq, and native Neo-Salafi extremists will be a threat for years to come. The impact on the region has alienated many Arabs and Muslims and has aided extremists. The war may create Iraq Shiite extremists as a lasting regional problem, and has already given Iran leverage that has added a new risk of Shi'ite extremism. PART RIGHT. MY GUT SAYS IRAN WILL COME TO ITS SENSES ABOUT THE DANGER OF AIDING THE INSURGENTS OF ALL STRIPES TO KEEP US IN A QUAG. I BUY INTO FRIEDMAN ARTICLE OF LAST WEEK. Objective Four: Stabilize the Gulf Region and Middle East: The war has been extremely divisive. It has created a major new source of anger against the U.S. and new tensions over the U.S. military presence in the region. Iran, Turkey, and neighboring Arab states have all become involved in destabilizing ways. PERHAPS BUT THE ARAB/MUSLIM WORLD IS ALWAYS A PROBLEM AND I AM NOT SURE THAT IF SADDAM HAD STAYED IN POWER AND LOST SANCTIONS AND STARTED REDEVELOPING WMDS THAT THREE-FIVE YEARS LATER THINGS WOULDNT BE MUCH WORSE. Objective Five: Ensure Secure Energy Exports: There have been consistently lower Iraqi exports than under Saddam. The predicted increases in Iraqi production during 2003-2005 have never occurred, and will not for years to come. There has been no meaningful renovation of oil fields and export facilities and serious further wartime disruption. The previous problems have spilled over into the other Gulf exporting states. OK Objective Six: Make Iraq a Democratic Example that Transforms the Middle East: Iraq is not a model of anything. Public opinion polls in region show that our invasion of Iraq, our inept public diplomacy, and our poorly handled efforts to inspire regional reform, have created new Arab fears of U.S., and serious distrust of U.S. efforts at reform in other countries. STILL HOPEFUL ALTHOUGH WE FINALLY ARE AT TIPPING POINT Objective Seven: Help Iraq Become a Modern Economy: The flood of wartime spending, oil for food money, and aid money has put tens of billions of dollars into the Iraqi economy and raised the GDP and per capita income on paper. So have record oil revenues. Even the latest Department of Defense quarterly status report has oil export revenues dominating the Iraqi portion of the GDP, projects this percentage will rise sharply in the future instead of Iraq moving towards balanced development. Most new businesses are shells, minor starts ups or war related. Youth unemployment easily averages more than 30 percent nationwide and is 40-60 percent in the troubled Sunni areas. As yet, no meaningful sectorial reform in agriculture, state industries, or the energy sector. A shift to focused short term aid and letting the Iraqis manage more of the money may help, but our efforts to date have largely been a wasteful, and highly ideological and bureaucratic, failure. LITTLE ECO PROGRESS GOES WITH INSURGENCY OF THIS STRENGTH--SAME WITH OIL ABOVE In short, the Iraqi war shows being a superpower, ideology, and good intentions are no substitute for realism and objectivity. Fighting wars successfully requires both a realistic grand strategy, having the real-world the ability to implement it, and providing the necessary resources from the start. We may salvage the Iraq War to the degree we defeat the insurgency and give the Iraqis something approaching a unified and pluralistic government, although the odds are at best even. There is little or no chance of salvaging the war in terms of our broader strategic objectives. 50/50 IS ABOUT RIGHT BUT THERE IS SOME CHANCE THAT A FEDERAL IRAQ--FORGET DEMOCRATIC AS WE KNOW IT CAN EXIST AND THWART TERRORISTS AND PERSIANS. TOO MANY FOLKS FORGET PERSIA AN OLD ENEMY OF ARABS AND SHIASS IN IRAQ ARE ARAB SO WE HAVE A SITUATION WHERE NATIONALISM VS RELIGION.