Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Should God be replaced? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: LLCF who wrote (23223)	3/20/2006 3:07:37 PM
From: Solon	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 28931

"ROFLAMO!!!!! You always know the difference between truth from falsehood then???" No, DAK. As I said--my facts may be refuted by new knowledge. All facts are qualified by our knowledge base. What I know the difference between is fact (qualified, as I have repeatedly said) and magical beliefs. "When YOU demonstrate that you don't have a clue WHAT I know about QM" I do have the clues and the body, as well! You told me you believed that "Science is showing that observing or putting your attention on something changes it". Therefore, you do not understand Quantum Mechanics. "Your refutation of my comment is all one needs to see to understand who has a greater understanding of the first paragraph" Finally, you make an intelligent comment. This must be on a par with a thousand monkeys typing Hamlet, huh! "Of course you can investigate all sorts of stuff I've posted" You posted obscure neologisms conflated with convoluted ideas and concepts. You did not communicate any of your beliefs or topics with clarity, nor did you invest your posts with logic. I have invited you to speak plainly and I can assure you I have no intention to ridicule you. But you have mumbled the TOE, the holographic principle, Jesus, Taoism, and other mutterings as though you were making an Intellect Stew. Well, DAK--for all I know you might have shat in that stew, as well. I cannot assist you to investigate these matters when you are smarmy and evasive. Thank you. "My own of course... who's elses opinion could I state?" So when you said "His relevance today is WAY overrated anyway" you meant that His relevance is "WAY overrated" by YOU! So...will you be able to stop yourself, DAK?!--LOL!! "all you do is deride religionists as ignorant troublemakes who create all the problems in the world." You are being silly, DAK. I don't believe any such thing nor do I preach such a thing. If you are referring to "religionist" by the common meaning of fanatic or zealot, then I will agree that such people represent a grave danger to the world. The past and the present are sufficient to verify this. And our life is not behind us...but ahead of us. Do the mathematics! ;-)