SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: longnshort who wrote (280993)3/20/2006 4:08:10 PM
From: Amy J  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1571172
 
There is nothing wrong with a teacher stating that some people believe in the things you stated. In fact, it could generate some interesting discussion where children can debate about what's more important to a country - a president that misleads a country over an affair or a president that misleads a country into war.

RE: "You wouldn't care??"

I care more about the freedom of people to express a diversity of opinions and to get all perspectives on the table. I think it's backwards, but I see nothing wrong with schools saying "there are some that believe the world was created by various religious ways and you can attend a relgious course at a private school to learn more" so they know the option is there. I can understand why some religious people have a conflict when schools completely discount their beliefs.

As a child, I always thought it was dishonest to pressure children into stating the pledge of Allegience "under God" while at the same time claiming the USA has a separation of church and govt. The dishonesty made me feel uncomfortable, more than anything else. We shouldn't say we are doing one thing while doing another. I strongly believe in the separation of church and govt, because the conflict of religion has the potential to bring out war and fanaticalism.