Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Srexley who wrote (733242)	3/20/2006 5:41:49 PM
From: DuckTapeSunroof	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 769670

"I would say that using international law to interpret our Constitution ...is quite different than the Shiavo case." So would I.... [What was 'dishonest'?] "Pinning a position on me that someone other than me had on the Shiavo case." I didn't. I NEVER SAID that was YOUR POSITION. (I merely said that the author of the posted piece seemed to be arguing FOR a 'more activist Supreme Court' because he was bemoaning the fact that the Justices did not intrude into the case.) However (something I alsp pointed out), it seemed he only wanted the justices to get 'active' FOR the causes that he agreed with. :) That's a very common thing (sadly). "Seems dishonest." No. It only seems like you got confused, and FORGOT that the comment I made was regarding the article you'd posted, and not regarding your PERSONAL positions.