Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Israel to U.S. : Now Deal with Syria and Iran -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: GUSTAVE JAEGER who wrote (10416)	3/21/2006 7:30:12 AM
From: sea_urchin	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 22250

Gus > I guess it's fair to say that Zionists carefully watched which way the wind was blowing so that they placed their bets on the winner. Considering that Germany was by then the hands-down winner and, in fact, England was ready to make a peace treaty, they unquestionably placed their bet on the loser. Furthermore, Germany did whatever it could so that the US did not come into the war, even going so far as warning Americans in public statements not to travel on the Lusitania which it knew would be regarded as a provocation if the vessel was attacked. But it also knew of the intention to put military ordinance on the vessel. So, clearly, there were no secrets. Spies must have been very busy. You have already raised the possibility that the sinking of the Lusitania was a 9/11 type event and when one thinks about it it could well have been. This is not to say that a US or British sub torpedoed the vessel because we know that a German one did. But I have considered that highly placed Zionist agents within the German navy could well have given the orders to do so and, in fact, knowing that Americans were aboard the vessel. Likewise, the well-timed Zimmerman telegram which we know was sent from Britain, and not from Germany. Indeed, it makes no sense for Germany to have sent a telegram to Mexico to attack the US when it believed the war with Britain was nearly over. > For all my opposition to Judeofascism, I would never go that far.... I believe most historians agree on the fact that the US government was pressed by several ethnic minorities in opposite directions I suppose it all depends on which history book one reads. I was concerned about the thread which runs from WW1 to Versailles to Hitler to the Holocaust and not about isolated and irrelevant events. I was also attempting to show that there was indeed a reason for the Nazi anti-Semitism, other than the alleged barbarism of the Germans, and that the Jews themselves could, in fact, have been responsible for it. Finally, my argument is intended to cast light on what is happening now with AIPAC and the neocons conspiring to bring the US into a series of wars for Israel's benefit which are against the US' own best interests and to tacitly imply that there could easily be a back-lash against this by Americans who are deeply upset by what has happened. Even you regard 9/11 as the work of the "Judeo Fascists".