Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Should God be replaced? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Solon who wrote (23243)	3/21/2006 10:56:44 AM
From: LLCF	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 28931

<Don't be stupid and arrogant. Millions and millions of people consider the supposed inerrancy (the Absolute Truth) of the bible to be fundamental to their weltanschauung.> I may be 'stupid', but the arrogant part goes to you... thinking that your opinion is going to change all that. <You are displaying both your ignorance and your arrogance. Even when you bring up pseudo-science it is simply stuff that I was reading decades ago.> Ooops, I have to flip flop now on the above now... since the majority of things I've brought up you claimed to have no clue... in fact some very basic concepts ("The One" for instance in religion/spirituality) you claimed you never even heard of (and was therefore clearly bull). < If you wish to truly discuss something, then you will have the courtesy to introduce more topic than, "HEY, DUDE! Did ya hear about the neat speculation!!"> I discuss when someone disscusses with me. If you don't like it here's another" "Hey Dude! Do YOU have anything to discuss besides badmouthing religion??" LOL <If you are not going to share with us anything from your own mind (apart from childish gutterals in half sentences), > Sure, I'll share this... anything ANYONE shares, IS from their own mind. <then have the courtesy to link a credible source > 1.) You mean like all your links? 2.) Oh, you mean you don't like the readings I've suggested, that's fair. 3.) Given 1& 2, there would be no discussion... which is fine, that's the same as we have now. <It is impossible for anyone on this thread to investigate the credibility of mumbling and grunting.> LOL.... exactly!! So quite it! ROFLAMO DAK