Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: JDN who wrote (161427)	3/21/2006 6:58:35 PM
From: slacker711	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 793999

Bush is no lame duck, we are lucky to have him and all our gains economically are SOLELY because of him. I give Bush some good marks for his economic policies during the first couple of years in office, but his failure to control spending is a strong counterbalance to his early years. Personally, I'm hoping that the Republicans lose either the House or the Senate. If the Republicans cant control the spending, perhaps gridlock might be the solution. Also, the comment that Bush is "soley" responsible for the economy is just nonsense. Do you really believe that? Slacker