SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Don't Blame Me, I Voted For Kerry -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: paret who wrote (74671)3/21/2006 8:12:57 PM
From: Land SharkRespond to of 81568
 
Faux News Losing Viewers - a Veritable Sinking Ship

Fox News Viewership Drops by Half in 6 Months
author: Wikipedia
Since the election, viewership in the coveted 25-54 age bracket of Fox News has fallen from over 1,000,000 in October to under 450,000 in April, according to a CNN press release.
Since the election, viewership in the coveted 25-54 age bracket of Fox News has fallen from over 1,000,000 in October to under 450,000 in April, according to a CNN press release.

The FOX News Channel is a US cable and satellite news channel. It is owned by the Fox Entertainment Group, a subsidiary of Rupert Murdoch's News Corporation. As of January 2005, it is available to 85 million subscribers in the U.S. and to further viewers internationally, broadcasting primarily out of its New York City studios.

According to the BBC, FOX News' profits doubled due to "patriotic coverage" of the Iraq conflict, with as much as 300% increase in viewership, with 3.3 million average daily viewers.

The 2004 election coverage by FOX News ranked higher than the next two cable news competitors combined. For President Bush's address, FOX News rated 7.3 million viewers. NBC, CBS, and ABC rated 5.9, 5.0, and 5.1, respectively.

Ratings for cable news stations have fallen since the election, but most have since stabilized, thus it is anomalous that Fox is continuing to drop. CNN's ratings, as an example, increased 27% in April.

The reason for Fox News' fall in viewership is not clear. Some speculate that the audience has turned to other news sources out of distrust or dislike of Fox News' reporting; others claim it to simply be a result in decreased interest in news in general; some suggest that other cable news channels have adopted Fox News' style and tenor.

Fox News Viewership:
Oct. 04: 1,074,000
Nov. 04: 891,000
Dec. 04: 568,000
Jan. 05: 564,000
Feb. 05: 520,000
March 05: 498,000
April 05: 445,000



To: paret who wrote (74671)3/21/2006 8:16:13 PM
From: Land SharkRespond to of 81568
 
You're type of People?

The Duplicity and Hypocrisy of Rush Limbaugh

Downfall of the car-jacker of the conservative cause

Richard Barrett

The facade of Rush Limbaugh being the "Great White Hope" has fallen under the weight of the "Big One," himself, nudged by the debacle over ESPN, in which the talk-show host was forced out for saying that a Negro football-player was "overrated." Limbaugh, who protested that his remarks had nothing to do with the Negro's race, then embarked on a tirade about how he supported Negroes, was a fan of Negroes in sports and believed in integration. The escapade stripped the Emperor's clothes completely away, leaving only a stark, naked Negrophile, solidly in the company of Trent Lott and other turncoats who had once been popular, principled and credible. However, observers suggested that the meltdown was taking place largely because Limbaugh had been a fraud, all along, whose pandering to Negroes had been masked by a career of hurling sarcastic but insincere puns. In fact, rightists pointed out that Limbaugh had used his jocular style to try to usurp efforts to purge sports and government of minorities, entirely, and restore an all-American America, by legitimizing the very forces he ridiculed.

Limbaugh had been the classic "sent over from the left to lead the right." He burst upon the radio scene a decade ago as the Republican Revolution, aimed at ousting Congressional leftists, was gaining steam. In his entertaining style, Limbaugh named himself titular head of the "conservative" cause, proceeding to poke fun at Ted Kennedy, Jesse Jackson and Bill Clinton. But an underlying heresy tarnished Limbaugh's feigned "conservative" credentials from the start. The word "conservative" was coined in 1964 by segregationists who took over the Republican Party, ousting Nelson Rockefeller and Bill Scranton and openly opposing the Civil Rights Bill and integration. The word "conservative," which was synonymous with "segregationist," meant "conserving" society as it was prior to attempts by Negroes and Communists to take over the country. Limbaugh saw it as his task to corrupt the term, water down the cause and, even, twist the direction of "conservatism." Since minorities and leftists had seized control of government when Limbaugh began to broadcast, the term "conservative" was axiomatic in terms of "conserving" what then existed, but it still was used by segregationists seeking to resurrect pre-1964 conditions.

Segregationists catapulted to power

Limbaugh, at first, softened up conservatives with an artillery barrage of jokes and puns mocking the welfare system, bureaucrats and the Black Caucus. He was credited with creating a political climate, over the radio, in which Newt Gingrich, backed by segregationist Governor Lester Maddox, and Trent Lott, backed by Mississippi segregationists, could be catapulted to national power. Limbaugh asserted that he spoke for "conservatives" over "liberals," which his large listening audience winked was "segregationists" over "integrationists." In fact, when he became a television host, his studio audience was entirely white. But code words served a dual purpose. They gained Limbaugh a following, but they, also, wooed whites away from their own, instinctive self-interests. Limbaugh, paradoxically, for example, interspersed barbs against the NAACP, for being "too liberal," with plaudits for Clarence Thomas, a Negro married to a white woman, in whose living room Limbaugh was married. The tactic was that there were "good" Negroes and "good" Jews who were "on our side," a ploy echoed by Diana Schneider, the Jewess editing the Limbaugh Letter. Schneider, even, announced that she was "glad" that the Skinhead website was her "enemy." The Skinheads had listed Limbaugh on their Impostors page.

Limbaugh made constant trips to Israel, where he "wailed" at the Wailing Wall and delivered support for the murderous Tel Aviv regime. He touted Michael Levine as his advisor and delivered unremitting support for the Israeli Lobby. He brought integration into his own studios, foisting Bo Snurdley, a Negro, as his call-screener, upon whom he conferred the title "Mister," a dig at Southerners who reserve such courtesy-titles solely for whites and who refer to Negroes only by their first-name. However, Limbaugh skirted mention of Rupert Murdock, the Australian Jew who financed Limbaugh's operations and garnered the talk-show host some $45 million profit a year. The bedrock "conservative" and segregationist principles were never mentioned. For example, the Eugenics position, which rejects the "abortionist" and "anti-abortionist" views in favor of producing fit, pure and compatible offspring, was "off-topic." Immigration was always spoken of in terms of curbing "illegals," never in keeping Mexicans out, altogether, or keeping America genetically ascendant. And, never was "blood" discussed as the foundation of the nation, but incessantly "economics," "interest-rates" and "taxes" were ascribed as cure-alls.

While Limbaugh was in seclusion following his resignation from ESPN, Tony Snow appeared as Limbaugh's apologist and "long-time friend." Snow repeated, over and over, that Limbaugh was not a segregationist and that segregationists were "a thing of the past." "Nobody," said Snow, wanted to repeal the Civil Rights Bill and "nobody" wanted whites to prevail over Negroes. At the same time, Snow tried to fend off news' accounts that the self-appointed arbiter of morality, actually, was a drug-addict, engaged in the illicit drug-trade and under criminal investigation. In the end, there was virtually no one to pull the chestnuts of the pretentious impostor out of the fire. J. C. Watts, the Negro who Limbaugh had campaigned for, was nowhere to be found. Thomas was mum. But Red Graham, who described himself as a one-time Limbaugh fan, said that Limbaugh was a "disgrace" who should step down. "We need to get back on track toward an all-American America," said Graham, a staunch segregationist, "without the duplicity and hypocrisy of Rush Limbaugh." Graham added that Limbaugh, who had never interviewed an avowed segregationist on his show, had "car-jacked the conservative cause" and "I'm glad he's through."



To: paret who wrote (74671)3/21/2006 8:19:22 PM
From: Land SharkRead Replies (1) | Respond to of 81568
 
Rumsfeld: Iraqis Now Capable Of Conducting War Without U.S. Assistance

March 17, 2006 | Issue 42•12

WASHINGTON, DC—Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld said Monday that escalating violence in Iraq demonstrates that the Iraqi population is now capable of waging the Iraq war without outside military aid, and pronounced the American mission there "a complete success."
Enlarge ImageRumsfeld

Rumsfeld lauds Iraqis' progress in making war.

"Over the last month, the Iraqis have been fighting like you wouldn't believe," said Rumsfeld in a press conference at the Pentagon. "New Iraqis are joining the war every day—so many, in fact, that we don't know where they all came from. It's almost as if they came out of nowhere."

"The scope and intensity of the combat in Iraq is such that I believe the presence of American forces in the country will no longer be required to help the Iraqi people plummet into meaningless violence," Rumsfeld added.

Rumsfeld had harsh words for what he called the "cowardly and small-minded opposition" to American involvement in the region.

"Critics of this war who said we couldn't inspire the Iraqi people to stand up and fight for themselves have been proven wrong," Rumsfeld said, gesturing toward a map displaying conflict across the entire nation. "There was the stubborn perception that after greeting us as liberators, the Iraqis had no fight in them, and couldn't effectively defend their interests. Without our presence on their soil, I doubt most Iraqis would ever have lifted a finger or picked up a gun at all. Now, there's almost no stopping them."

A Department of Defense analysis released Monday gave the Iraqi combatants high marks for morale, tenacity, and unit cohesiveness, and noted "outstanding improvement" in the following areas: improvised explosive manufacturing, roadside-bomb concealment, sniping, checkpoint attacking, civilian massacres, mosque destruction, and guerrilla-style ambush.

"The average Iraqi fighter has made remarkable progress and we are very proud," said Lt. Col. Bailey Whitman, a spokesman for coalition forces stationed in Baghdad. "In the past several weeks, people across Iraq have, in a systematic way unthinkable just three years ago, overrun both Shi'a and Sunni neighborhoods with devastating results. This is an out-and-out success by the standards of the modern American military."

The lieutenant colonel's remarks were cut short when a rocket-propelled grenade detonated outside his briefing room, spraying him with dust and pulverized glass. Brushing off his jacket, Whitman gestured to the jagged gash in the wall and smiled. "The Iraqis are doing just fine on their own."
Enlarge ImageIraqis

Iraqi citizens, inspired by the U.S. military presence, prepare for war.

According to Commanding General George W. Casey, the Iraqi people are filling their role as models for independence in the Middle East. "We helped them get rid of a dictator, they held successful elections, they're writing a constitution, and, just like in our Civil War, brother has taken up arms against brother," Casey said. "After five to 10 years of unspeakable brutality and bloodshed, they'll be well on their way to a full-fledged democracy."

Rumsfeld, however, sought to reassure the Iraqi people that despite their rapid improvement, the U.S. would not abandon them.

"We've accomplished a lot," Rumsfeld said. "But there's still so much to take from the people of this rich country, and we're not going to pack up and leave just because they're doing so well on their own. We look forward to working very, very closely with Iraq, once there's a friendly government in place that we can do business with."

Added Rumsfeld: "We plan to be around for a long, long time."



To: paret who wrote (74671)3/21/2006 8:20:50 PM
From: Land SharkRespond to of 81568
 
I guess you're against the Women's Right to Vote

Constructionist Supreme Court To Revisit Women's Suffrage

March 17, 2006 | Issue 42•12

WASHINGTON, DC—The Supreme Court, demonstrating its new constructionist leaning since the appointment of Justice Samuel Alito, will re-examine arguments behind the 19th Amendment this week. "There was no constitutional precedent for amending the law of the land so dramatically," the Heritage Foundation's Trent England said Monday. "A case could be made on social grounds, but what the Court will determine is exactly what the framers of the Constitution wanted." While it's difficult to predict an outcome, observers believe Ruth Bader Ginsburg will use her three-fifths of a vote to oppose.



To: paret who wrote (74671)3/22/2006 11:49:44 AM
From: American SpiritRespond to of 81568
 
Please spare us the "communist" BS. No one has done more to strengthen communist China than Bush-Cheney. While we have depleted our military strength bogged down in Iraq, Bush-Cheney are allowing any US company to ship our jobs to China. Bush has also borrowed hundreds of billions from China, putting us deeply in debt to them and making them are masters.

Also, Bush talks tough but hasn't done jack to weaken Castro or North Korea. In fact he's made North Korea more dangerous.

Worst of all, Bush has turned almost the entire planet against us. Hopefully though the world realizes that we in the US don't like Bush-Cheney either. It's just going to take a little time to get rid of them.

PS: Blaming the press for Bush's failures won't work. The press reports the truth. Bushies don't.



To: paret who wrote (74671)3/22/2006 1:57:00 PM
From: RichnorthRespond to of 81568
 
A parrot like you will do well to gain insights from:

lrb.co.uk
(user-friendly version)

OR at

ksgnotes1.harvard.edu
(in pdf)

to understand why there are fewer readers of certain newspapers/journals and watchers of certain TV/cable channels these days. The J.L is behind all that!!!
.