Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : The Epic American Credit and Bond Bubble Laboratory -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: UncleBigs who wrote (56581)	3/22/2006 9:23:10 PM
From: TobagoJack	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 110194

hello bigs, a small revaluation (1-2%) would be a nod, as opposed to a large revaluation (3%+), which would be a blink. I do not see that China has either (i) the imperative to blink, or (ii) the pre-requisit financial strength to blink. ... with me, it does not followed that dollar would gain sustainable strength against other currencies, AND the RMB would gain sustainable strength against USD, until we are nearing the end-game. We are no where nearing the end game. All nations are printing, and has the imperative to print more. The rich nations can print more, and the large nations can print more. Where it all settles would be the traditional place, monetary reset, except this time it will be different, because it will be planet-wide. Immediately before monetary reset, one should ideally be 100% allocated to gold, because everything with a taxing address will be liberated and redistributed. Traditionally, revolutions, especially of the violent sort, tends to cleanse, in the leadup to monetary reset, or in the followon to same. Revolution, Argentine style or Russia fashion, is the ultimate 'majority rule' process, and that may be where we are headed, I figure. Paper currencies? they will zig and zag, and eventually go where all paper currencies go. I guess.