Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: DuckTapeSunroof who wrote (733747)	3/23/2006 9:59:58 AM
From: PROLIFE	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 769670

Bush ressurected by… Saddam? By Dave Weinbaum jewishworldreview.com History makes strange bedfellows…Israel and Germany, Russia and the USA, Mary Matalin and James Carville. Now comes the unintentional alliance between what used to be death-grip, all out foes, Saddam and Dubya. This isn't wild speculation. This isn't a Republican trick. This isn't April Fools Day (yet). We have the tapes…well 12 hours of them, anyway. There are 3,000 hours more to be analyzed. Hussein makes Nixon look like a piker. Plus, there are 35,000 boxes of written docs and computer discs waiting to be translated and released. In a spring '95 meeting, Saddam's son-in-law, Hussein Kamil, the man in charge of WMDS "destruction", is heard discussing hiding information and WMDS from the UN. "We did not reveal all that we have, not the type of weapons, not the volume of materials we imported, not the volume of production we told them about, not the volume of use. None of it was correct." According to ABC News, this meeting took place with Saddam and his senior leaders. This dialogue was precipitated by a group discussion of how the UN had discovered Iraq's bio weapons program, one that they denied from the ceasefire of 91' until then. Let's not forget that Saddam kicked the UN inspectors out in 1998…for four years. By the way, I'm citing ABC news, not Fox, Rush, O'Reilly, Hannity, or Coulter. Further stories from ABC tie Iraq to Osama, plasma nukes and Saddam's continued war against the USA AFTER he signed the '91 ceasefire. The above is backed up by Larry Elder's revealing interview with General Georges Sada, second in command of the Iraqi Air Force under Saddam. He claims Iraq had chemical, biological, and nuclear weapons and had bad intentions toward the west in general and the USA in particular. Just before the coalition invaded, Saddam, under the pretext of sending aid to Syria for a collapsed dam and the resulting floods, converted a jumbo 747 and 727. He used the planes to smuggle 100s of tons of WMDS into Syria via 56 flights to Damascus. Also, Hussein sent a large truck convoy smuggle WMDS to Syria at the same time. Seems that the war in Iraq was and is crucial to defeating Osama and his ilk. Bush told the truth. ROPE-A-DOPED AGAIN? This is bad news for Liberals. They filled the media with "Bush lied, people died" tripe. Plus the timing of the releases couldn't be worse for Democrats. With 2006 congressional elections looming, the Dubya hating crowd may find the news too firm to back away from. They'd have to convince the American people that they were for the war until they realized Bush lied, thus demanding a US withdrawal from Iraq. Now, after the new tape information is trickled out, Dems would have to support the war…again! That would be too big of a stretch for even John "I voted for the war before I voted against it" Kerry. Even my washing machine can't spin this much without breaking a belt. BUSH'S PSYCHIATRIST ASKED HIM TO TAKE AN IQ TEST. BUSH SAID, "SURE, WHERE TO?" Everyone knows that Bush can't strategically time the release of the tapes and docs to Republican advantage for the November elections. He's too stupid. Remember the diagnosis from Dr. Howie "Bush is Brain-dead" Dean. Democrats remind me of the new ad picturing people giddy about their colonoscopies. Are Dems begging Bush to "bring it on"? Didn't the last two elections thump enough jolts up their backsides? Heck most Liberals are still walking bowlegged after the 2004 debacle. Maybe the President's just lucky…yeah that's the ticket! jewishworldreview.com