Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Don't Blame Me, I Voted For Kerry -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Dan B. who wrote (74784)	3/25/2006 1:09:26 AM
From: Cogito	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 81568

>>It CAN be repeated as though it is believed, if it IS believed, and there is simply no foul in that.<< Dan - You can pretty much find someone to believe anything you want to repeat, then. There are people who believe all kinds of things. There are people who believe the attacks on 9/11 were orchestrated by the Bush administration. Does that mean I should repeat that as if it's the truth? There's contradictory evidence in the case of the supposed Prague meeting, and the testimony is credible only to those who are determined to prove a connection between Al Qaeda and Saddam Hussein no matter what. - Allen

To: Dan B. who wrote (74784)	3/25/2006 2:26:20 PM
From: Orcastraiter	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 81568

Suggesting that I think there should be some "lesser standard" for deciding whether or not to go to war is very wrong of you. I agree with that. The alleged Atta meeting in Prague does not meet any standard of proof. We're talking about proof and justification for war. The standards for that must be very high indeed, yes? Otherwise treason has been committed. So far you have convinced me that we have enough evidence to convict Bush and Cheney of treason. Orca