SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Banned.......Replies to the A@P thread. -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Port_O_Call who wrote (5345)3/26/2006 1:58:34 PM
From: lucky_girl  Respond to of 5425
 
Hello, Port o Call,
All I mentioned in my post was Amr’s attempted ‘run’ to San Diego so he could cross the boarder to Mexico before he would fly away to the Mid-East. When I originally mentioned Amr’s Mexican I.D. ‘quickie’ boarder pass was on his person the day he tried to fly back to San Diego I got a lot of flack on this board from the o, so, regular, ‘regulars’ saying that the only identification that Amr was carrying that day, in another name other than his own, was a Montana issued drivers license.

The board regulars were in error but not their fault because the first story released to the web by the WSJ was pulled from the news wires and a ‘second’ story was published on the web that did not mention Amr’s Mexican ‘quickie’ boarder pass. The WSJ had their reasons for doing this at the time.

In court documents it came out that Amr also carried that Mexican I.D. issued in a name other than his own as well as the ‘other’ I.D., which was a Montana driver’s license, which was also issued in a name other than his own.

The Mexican I.D. was his ‘instant’ cross the boarder ‘pass’, and even though it had expired he could have still used it. Because he pulled in a lot more money than could be accounted for it makes sense that Amr wanted to get back to his home in San Diego, and then travel the few miles from his home to the boarder to cross at Tijuana, Mexico to get what he has stashed ‘over the boarder.’ Transport out of Mexico to Lebanon in the Mid-East, where Amr has a beautiful home lying vacant, waiting for him, would have been much simpler to ‘quickly’ arrange in Mexico.

If Amr gets a short sentence he may still realize his dream. If not then what he has ‘stashed’ in Mexico will remain there until HE can claim it in person. His wife cannot claim what is in Mexico; it is simple logic that this is WHY he made the attempt to get there himself; instead of sending her.

If his wife’s name is on the deed on the property purchased in Lebanon then she can at least sell this property to help maintain her family.
Mary is beautiful, she is going to find a way to capitalize on her looks to survive what has happened to her and her children.

.



To: Port_O_Call who wrote (5345)3/26/2006 2:59:42 PM
From: Bill Ulrich  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 5425
 
What a rant, Pugs! As far as the "... what the rest of us see as self-evident," thing --- who is "rest of us"? You + two other conspiracy bozos, is not exactly a significant (nor impressive) "rest of us".