Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Hawkmoon who wrote (184267)	3/29/2006 9:11:48 AM
From: michael97123	Respond to of 281500

NYT Times front page today says that the admin now nixes the current PM. There are more sunni deaths from pms power broker sadrs militia than from sunni militants. Now we are for regime change (again) in iraq. We havent won diddly in iraq but this committment of american lives and treasure must have an end date to have continued limited support of americans. US/IRAN talks may provide results. IF i am not mistaken the iranians would prefer the other shiaa candidate who was beaten by one vote. They too are or s/b uneasy with al sadr's influence. There was a reported attempt the other day of a possible attempt to capture or kill al sadr. You wont be able to diffuse the sunni insurgency with al sadr running loose and i am sure there are other militias giving us problems as well. If al sadr stays safe and the currrent pm remains in power, we will have no choice to get out of the way of the coming civil war.

To: Hawkmoon who wrote (184267)	3/29/2006 11:06:10 AM
From: zonkie	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 281500

<<<Figured if I acted like a complete idiot, then maybe you'd treat me as an equal........Guess I need to be even more of an idiot before I can talk on your level..>>> You're quite good at looking like a complete idiot. It must come natural. Can you go even farther and talk on junior's level? ""The California crunch really is the result of not enough power-generating plants and then not enough power to power the power of generating plants."—Interview with the New York Times, Jan. 14, 2001" "First, we would not accept a treaty that would not have been ratified, nor a treaty that I thought made sense for the country." GW Bush ""My pan plays down an unprecedented amount of our national debt."—Budget address to Congress, Feb. 27, 2001" GW Bush