SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : The Environmentalist Thread -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: longnshort who wrote (6107)3/30/2006 4:54:38 PM
From: maceng2  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 36921
 
Re "junk science" link. Yes, I have read that link thank you. I don't deny that many have used the GW as a band wagon to jump on.

The two links I presented are supposed to be a level analysis though. I found a problem with the case presented that there is no concern. The graphs were presented backwards to what is normally read.

The fact remains, looking at the last 650,000 years, current CO2 levels are statistically out of the normal distribution. The last 50 years show a truly abnormal trend where levels are approximately 40% above maximum levels seen in the record (650,000 years).



To: longnshort who wrote (6107)3/31/2006 1:06:49 PM
From: Peter Dierks  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 36921
 
From that page:
junkscience.com

Does this look like catastrophic global warming?