Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : FREE AMERICA -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: KLP who wrote (1115)	3/30/2006 5:39:49 PM
From: michael97123	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 14758

FOR WHAT IT'S WORTH Buffalo Springfield Paranoia strikes deep Into your life it will creep It starts when you're always afraid Step outta line, the men come, and take you away

To: KLP who wrote (1115)	3/30/2006 8:00:24 PM
From: Sully-	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 14758

<< "AND WHY is it so important to the NYT to get the story so wrong?" >> The NYT illegally leaked the NSA warrantless wiretap story. Besides being typical left wingers with BDS, they have insisted from the start that this was an "illegal" case of "domestic spying" by the eeeeevil Chimpy McBushHitler Admin. They simply have to continue to misrepresent all facts contrary to their now well entrenched position. And since they are in control of what gets reported to most Americans, they still believe they can get away with it. *** From John Hinderaker @ Power Line ....As we noted here... powerlineblog.com ...[New York Times reporter] Eric Lichtblau has a huge personal investment in the idea (wrong, I think) that the NSA program is "illegal." Is Lichtblau's commitment to that proposition causing him to report falsely on testimony that was given to a Senate committee? Message 22307251 ....Eric Lichtblau has a considerable career investment (and, I suspect, an ideological investment as well) in the idea that the NSA program is illegal. It would seem that Lichtblau's preconceptions and biases prevented him from accurately reporting what happened in the Judiciary Committee hearing yesterday. His suggestion that the main thrust of the judges' testimony was to "voice skepticism about the president's constitutional authority" is simply wrong; in fact, I can't find a single line in more than 100 pages of transcript that supports Lichtblau's reporting. It's a sad thing when a once-respected newspaper can't be counted on for a straight account of a Congressional hearing. Message 22309871