Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Ride the Tiger with CD -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: rubbersoul who wrote (47243)	3/30/2006 8:30:16 PM
From: Proud Deplorable	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 312809

Just remember to read between the lines on DJE. Dines isn't one to be left holding the bag nor would he bring his shareholders into something that would fall on unrelated (to Uranium) news. I believe the Tinsley thing was already known by Dines so here's what I see as possibilities: Dines built a big position as we know, finds out that Tinsley gas efforts are no good so the day before DJE announces that, he hypes of the stock? This isn't his style as it leaves his shareholders saying WTF? I guess he somehow knew about Tinsley anyway and so would not have done this to his subscribers. The other possibility is he knew about Tinsley and knew the recent share price was factoring in a bust but decided to protect his shareholders and himself by recommending it at this time knowing that there would be enough support to balance out the Tinsley news, which is why I believe that any dumping will be short lived as the shares will be scooped up by his followers and others who are in this for the uranium. NEVER underestimate Dines. Stay in this one.