Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Bosco & Crossy's stock picks,talk area -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: rubbersoul who wrote (19159)	3/30/2006 8:57:01 PM
From: jayt	Respond to of 37387

I agree with you. Too many future catalyst for this particular company. I'm in under $1 and feel that I don't own enough...so bring on the sale. If it gives up 30% so be it. It almost felt surreal yesterday. The important thing is that we have seen the 2's on huge volume....had larger volume today as it "back filled" some profit taking. And it will back and fill some more and then probably find support in the 1.50-1.60 range and build a base there....which would be nice. I'm sure we will hear plenty tomorrow. - JT

To: rubbersoul who wrote (19159)	3/31/2006 10:27:13 AM
From: AuBug	Respond to of 37387

Didn't Dr Clark own the original claim in Athabasca Basin that was the seed for DJE.v? My gut has been telling me that he knew something from the beginning. Neighboring claims showing good results so I'm very hopeful they'll find yellowcake. I've read that 1% uranium ore is equivalent to 50 g/t gold ore. That ratio may have changed recently but the thing to keep in mind is that when gold explorers put proven ounces into the NI 43-101 resource category Mr Market will value them in the neighborhood of $200/oz in the ground. I don't have time to do the math now but for a reasonable sized deposit this turns into a lot of market cap very fast.