SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: LindyBill who wrote (162645)3/31/2006 5:40:39 AM
From: JDN  Respond to of 793963
 
I am opposed to Iran acquiring Nuclear weapons and I believe if they do we can pretty much count on a disaster at least in the Middle East. But, I am also opposed to the USA taking unilateral action here. IMHO we ought to tell the world THIS TIME we are all going in this together and each and every nation MUST supply SOMETHING to the effort in order that you cant criticize it later. jdn



To: LindyBill who wrote (162645)3/31/2006 6:01:14 AM
From: John Carragher  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 793963
 
this bomb test must be part of the plan.
Message 22312357



To: LindyBill who wrote (162645)3/31/2006 12:54:09 PM
From: KLP  Respond to of 793963
 
And ...what will happen if the Adm tells the rest of the world, and those in our Congress who would oppose doing anything in Iran, that we will wait until the others in the world combine to rid Iran of it's missiles...?

It almost seems that that should be our policy....if Iran is stupid enough to destroy one of our cities, then all bets are off.



To: LindyBill who wrote (162645)3/31/2006 2:59:23 PM
From: rich evans  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 793963
 
I am in the camp that says let Europe and Israel take the lead as to Iran. The missiles won't reach here. We achieve more by doing nothing and letting others deal with the problem. Then they come to us ( like Bosnia, Darfur, etc) and we can then decide.

Rich