Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : The Environmentalist Thread -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: maceng2 who wrote (6118)	3/31/2006 6:04:49 PM
From: Peter Dierks	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 36921

That is interesting. Most people who question the validity of the global warming theory keep asking how 47 years of data can be analyzed for a multi millennium trend. 1860 seems to ge greater than 47 years ago. It would re reasonable to assume that it is synthesized data, which causes doubt of its validity. Of course if the 47 year trend plus interpolated data is indicative of a trend, we need to address the growing problem soon. Here are a few recent posts that address the issue from a more sceptical POV: Ripping apart Global Warming reporting mythology: Message 21043692 Hockey Stick refuted: Message 21059025 Global warming causing extreme cold temperatures? Message 22101859 The truth about global warming? Message 21731528 Coming Ice Age: Message 21061513