SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Advanced Micro Devices - Moderated (AMD) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: BUGGI-WO who wrote (191538)4/1/2006 3:39:45 AM
From: dougSF30Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 275872
 
Buggi, 1.5B would be an 11% increase over Q4's equivalent of 1.35B, not 15%. Also, he did say "push close" to 1.5B. So, say 10% Q/Q rev growth. As for why one might not rule this out, consider AMD's Q4 guidance vs. results, and Hector's intention to "underpromise and overdeliver".



To: BUGGI-WO who wrote (191538)4/1/2006 8:54:25 AM
From: CraveyRead Replies (1) | Respond to of 275872
 
Buggi,

But I'm much more worried about your revenue forecast for
Q1.


I never said my guess was right, but can explain the reasoning.

Relevant Data Points (all total processor)

Q105 Processor Revenue $7611 ($6861 I + $750 A)
Q405 Processor Revenue $8636 ($7329 I + $1307 A)

Q105 Revenue y/y growth +16.3%
Q104 Revenue y/y growth +21.9%

Q404/Q105 Revenue q/q <1.1%>
Q403/Q104 Revenue q/q <7.9%>

So going conservative on the yr/yr growth (say 10%) ends up with total processor revenue of $8372 ($7611*1.10). Going a little more aggressive than normal on q/q (9%) ends up with a revenue number of $7858 ($8636*.91).

So I am taking the lower number of $7858 for my estimates. The ongoing growth of notebooks and servers (higher ASPs) at a higher rate than desktops seems to be driving the higher revenue gains vs the unit numbers.

Intel did $10.2B in revenue for Q405 of which $7.3B was processors (72%). They have given revised, revised guidance to be in the $8.9B range. That is a reduction of $1.3B of which at least $933M (1.3 x .7185) is processors.

Total market of $7858 less Intel sales of $6396 ($7329 - $933) leaves a market of $1462 for AMD. Add in the PCS and other category of roughly $45M and you get to my $1.5B in revenue.

How do they get there? They picked up at least 10 points in US retail market share Q105 vs Q404 - good for an additional 600K units or so. I expect more of the same in other consumer segments around the world. They continue growing ASP as dual core and Turion have become more prevalent. And Opteron keeps gaining share (at a lower rate).

Why would I not believe Hector? For Q405, guidance was 7% to 13% sequential growth. AMD delivered 34%. For Q1, it is flat to slightly down. They can do 10% based on my numbers above.

Of course, if the market totally tanks, everything would be thrown off. However, I think the market dynamics are working in AMDs favor. It looks to me that Enterprise replacement (Intel strength) is off and Consumer/SMB is pretty strong.

So, that is how I got to the $1.5B. No guarantees, this is a message board afterall.

Cravey.



To: BUGGI-WO who wrote (191538)4/1/2006 10:21:51 AM
From: TechieGuy-altRead Replies (1) | Respond to of 275872
 
@BUGGI-WO\ Re. Mossman.

I think that he's just playing a game. His game is to quitely increase his #'s so much for Q1 as to force them to "miss".

That'll be another opportunity to issue a "sell" report on the stock.

TG