Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : FREE AMERICA -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: American Spirit who wrote (1413)	4/4/2006 12:39:03 PM
From: Bill	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 14758

LOL. Please show us some evidence to support your "99.9% accuracy" contention. (BTW, every study I've seen on the topic shows the NYT to be no more accurate than Drudge.)

To: American Spirit who wrote (1413)	4/4/2006 1:03:17 PM
From: michael97123	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 14758

I agree with most of your rant AS. Papers like the NYTimes, Washington Post, & Christian Science Monitor are all great papers and national treasures. Are they 99% accurate as you say--nah but they are far more accurate than the fluff printed in most other newspapers. If they (the cons) are so upset about MSM let them send some conservatives to journalism school and then buy some newpspears of their own. Vanderlay thinks that Anne Coulter and Rush are Godlike figures always telling the truth. Sort of like the adam and eve of talk radio--i shudder to think of whether the progeny of a coulter and rush union will be anorexic or drug addicted. They obviously are both apple eaters.