Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Alighieri who wrote (283066)	4/5/2006 9:18:55 AM
From: Elroy	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 1576363

Sorry, but this is irrelevant to an iraqi exit strategy, which is what's implied in the one for one swap. Your English is making no sense. If a one for one swap implies an Iraqi exit strategy, how can it also be irrelevant to an Iraqi exit strategy? Anyway, my point that Iraqis should have been trained to do much of the "police work" in three months stands. That's not about an exit strategy, a grand plan to stabilize the country, a unification process or anything other than what it says - IMO Iraqis should have been doing the basic day to day civil society security work (police, check points, curfew monitors, whatever etc.) starting from 3-6 months after the fall of Saddam.