Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Don't Blame Me, I Voted For Kerry -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Orcastraiter who wrote (75119)	4/5/2006 11:22:34 AM
From: lorne	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 81568

Orca. you said...."I think it makes sense to shoot first if, and only if, you have concrete information (solid intelligence was the word used by Powell to describe Iraq's WMD) that not doing so will mean being attacked. That's the simple answer."..... I think I agree with that...I have not been saying what should be done but asking others what they thought. In the case of Iran who have openly threatened USA and the State of Israel and given the fact that most EU countries and the USA believe that Iran will have Nukes very soon and likely already have other WMD ... And given that Iran is under the absolute control of radical islam....I wonder if that is concrete information or solid intelligence? Unfortunately there are millions of innocent Iranian citizens going to get caught in any cross fire.