Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Hawkmoon who wrote (184651)	4/5/2006 11:46:21 PM
From: sylvester80	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 281500

>>>when there hadn't been any inspections for 5 years?? That's just an outright lie. When Bush invaded Iraq he actually had to ask the UN inspectors to get out first you idiot. You are such a freaking LIAR. Just like your lying hero traitor Bush.

To: Hawkmoon who wrote (184651)	4/6/2006 1:36:20 PM
From: cnyndwllr	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 281500

Hawk, why won't you simply answer my question instead of making the illogical argument that a lack of inspections for 5 years prevented us from confirming when, in fact, you know we were in the process of widespread inspections and we pulled the inspectors out? At least you didn't say, this time, that the fact that he didn't produce any wmds was PROOF that he wasn't cooperating. But back to my original question: ------------------------------------------------------- Hawk, re: "THEY ALL AGREED UNANIMOUSLY THAT NO ONE COULD BE CERTAIN THAT SADDAM DIDN'T HAVE WMDS, AND THAT UNCERTAINLY REPRESENTED A MATERIAL BREACH OF UNSC BINDING RESOLUTIONS." Some of us have a hard time understanding how easy it is to prove a negative to a certainty. Maybe you can help? Why don't you tell me how you'd prove, to a certainty, that you don't beat your wife? I say you do beat her. You beat her in ways that don't show the bruises but you beat her badly and if left alone you'll beat other people's wives too. You tell me what method you'll use to prove me wrong to a certainty or you'll face the consequences. And yes, I've paid or threatened a bunch of my friends to agree with me so you'd better damn straight give me something I can't argue with. g. It's that reality thing raising its ugly head and ruining the high of another "we're right" fairy tale. ---------------------------------------------------------- It's not easy getting called on smug conclusions that, when broken down, don't hold water, is it? Ed