SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : The Epic American Credit and Bond Bubble Laboratory -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: loantech who wrote (57626)4/6/2006 4:14:36 PM
From: Ramsey Su  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 110194
 
A few months ago, I asked a friend who works at HUD with all the exotic mortgages out there these days, why do we even need HUD? I never did get a response. <gggg>



To: loantech who wrote (57626)4/6/2006 4:25:09 PM
From: Elroy Jetson  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 110194
 
Maybe they are trying to off-set the down-turn in real estate prices in bubble areas, with an upsurge in real estate prices in non-bubble areas.

FHA is coming out with new guide lines to get everybody in. Eliminating most of the down payment of 3%. Lowering credit standards to try to capture the sub prime market.

I know this will not affect So. Cal but it may push the bubble harder else where.

Most our borrowers are going 100% CLTV with some form of piggyback.

some are putting maybe 5% down and on occasion 10%.

Total quality of borrowers is poor in my opinion which is not worth squat............

.



To: loantech who wrote (57626)4/6/2006 7:49:46 PM
From: booyaka  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 110194
 
Most our borrowers are going 100% CLTV

If I was buying a house, I'd also go 100% LTV, nonrecourse all the way. Not because I don't have cash for a downpayment but because I'm not willing to risk being a bagholder. Btw, what does the C stand for in CLTV??