Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: longnshort who wrote (283303)	4/7/2006 7:15:53 AM
From: paret	Respond to of 1574004

SPECIAL REPORT: The Ward Churchill files News investigation of the charges before a CU panel reveals strong evidence of possible misconduct by the professor Editor's blog denver.rockymountainnews.com Essays listing Churchill as author mirror work by Canadian group Experts: Professor broke copyright law Barry Gutierrez © News "You are not qualified to assess my scholarship ... I'm not going to spend the rest of my life talking about my ancestry." — Ward Churchill Shadows of doubt A News investigation finds problems in all four major areas before CU panel. June 4 coverage » -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- The charge: Fabrication Did Churchill falsely accuse the U.S. Army of using smallpox as a weapon of genocide against American Indians? Our findings: His claim isn't supported by the sources he has cited. June 6 coverage » -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- The charge: Plagiarism Did Churchill commit plagiarism by publishing the work of others as his own? Our findings: An essay he "prepared" for a book was actually taken from a Canadian scholar. June 7 coverage » -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- The charge: Mischaracterization Did Churchill mischaracterize two important pieces of federal Indian law? Our findings: His contentions about the Dawes Act of 1887 and the Indian Arts and Crafts Act of 1990 are incorrect. June 8 coverage » -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- The charge: Misrepresentation Are Churchill's claims of American Indian ancestry valid? Our findings: His assertions that he is descended from Cherokee and Creek ancestors aren't supported by extensive genealogical records. June 9 coverage »