Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : View from the Center and Left -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Lane3 who wrote (16331)	4/7/2006 3:13:46 PM
From: MrLucky	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 543605

Krauthammer explicitely rejected the notion of employers policing I find him to be much more logical and smarter than many of the talking heads and columnists, but disagree on his point about the duty of an employer. They have an important role to play and it is time they do so. I believe the main reason they avoid this is because it will affect their bottom line. And the current ID process sucks! A bullet proof ID is the easy part. Getting people to enforce the rules is the hard part. Shouldn't be. I wish Krauthammer would have discussed the worn out cliche, "they just come to do the work that Americans won't do". I'm not sure if anyone in the DC bubble has ever contradicted that view. Certainly has been expressed often enough by a wide variety of politicians.