Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: pompsander who wrote (735971)	4/7/2006 7:21:38 PM
From: DuckTapeSunroof	Respond to of 769670

Re: "McClellan argued the release of the declassified information was very different from...." Well, now... "different" is very much in the eye of the beholder, eh? (Guess perhaps the meaning of the word "is" comes in to play here somewhere.... :) Of course, that's EXACTLY what one hires a Press Secretary to do: SPIN, and spin SUCCESSFULLY.

To: pompsander who wrote (735971)	4/8/2006 12:32:20 AM
From: DuckTapeSunroof	Respond to of 769670

HOUSE INTEL COMMITTEE URGES NEW ACTION AGAINST LEAKS Existing laws prohibiting unauthorized disclosures of classified information have not been effective, the House Intelligence Committee stated in a new report on the 2007 intelligence authorization act published today. "Additional and more creative steps to deter unauthorized disclosures are warranted," the report said. Towards that end, the Committee asked the Director of National Intelligence to study the feasibility of revoking the pensions of those who commit unauthorized disclosures. Furthermore, "the Committee has initiated a review of certain specific potential unauthorized disclosures of classified information at the request of the Speaker of the House." "That review primarily is concentrating on an investigation of four cases to develop a better understanding of the related facts and circumstances. The investigation is in turn expected to better enable the Committee to understand how and why unauthorized disclosures occur, and how the protection of classified information is perceived in practice." "By definition, no individual--whether a journalist, government official, or intelligence community employee--can or should singlehandedly presume to determine what information 'deserves' to be withheld from disclosure in order to protect national security, especially without full knowledge of the surrounding context," the Committee stated. In one startling passage, the Committee suggests that even the unauthorized receipt of classified information, and not merely its unauthorized disclosure, should be subject to legal penalties: "The Committee's work plan for this fiscal year includes reviewing all legal avenues to bring to justice those who violate the law, including those who knowingly receive, what is essentially, stolen classified information." It goes without saying that the President's irregular treatment of classified information in the Libby case invites cynicism about the whole subject. The House Intelligence Committee report on the FY 2007 Intelligence Authorization Act is available here: fas.org