SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : FREE AMERICA -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: KLP who wrote (2317)4/8/2006 10:13:21 AM
From: PartyTime  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 14758
 
>>>Show proof of that. The papers even the NYT said there was NOTHING about Plame in them.<<<

You are correct. There is no mention of Plame. But there is mention of Wilson. And then, of course, there's that there timeline. You're welcome to draw a diversionary conclusion, but I don't think it'll hold up to scrutiny long--especially once the testimony begins and more documents are released. The position you're taking, thinking the timeline doesn't fit the Plame revelations, is like standing in quicksand.



To: KLP who wrote (2317)4/8/2006 12:48:40 PM
From: J_F_Shepard  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 14758
 
Judith Miller, the NYT's reporter who got the leak from Libby, had the name "Valerie Flame" in her hand written notes....I know it's a stretch for some but do you think that's a coincidence?

select.nytimes.com


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News