Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : The Environmentalist Thread -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: maceng2 who wrote (6234)	4/8/2006 11:33:38 AM
From: longnshort	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 36917

Good plan I'm gonna charge my customers more because of GW, my business has nothing to do with it , but some dumb enviro libs just might believe me.

To: maceng2 who wrote (6234)	4/9/2006 10:36:49 AM
From: Wharf Rat	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 36917

"I would argue the case that less fat people in Europe & USA and more trees in the Amazon jungle could only possibly benifit the people struck with hurricane force premiums for house insurance in the USA." Less fat people would certainly benefit anybody in a hospital who has to deal with them,. Too many friends have blown out their backs and shoulders moving fat people. Way too many. What can you say, when they have to call maintenance to get four big guys to help transfer patients? Grrrr. And it struck me, a few weeks ago,that we have a new cure for obesity related problems. Instead of telling fat folks to lose weight to cure their obstructive sleep apnea,we buy them a CPAP machine to wear at night. Grrrr. We, like you and me,cuz so much is medicare related.