SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: GUSTAVE JAEGER who wrote (283447)4/8/2006 11:44:37 AM
From: longnshort  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1572172
 
WRONG

European Muslims seek social, political integration

By Brian Murphy
ASSOCIATED PRESS
April 8, 2006

VIENNA, Austria -- European Muslims are not content to remain "separate and isolated," and moderate Islamic leaders must make greater social and political integration their goal, the head of Austria's Islamic community urged yesterday.
Anas Schakfeh, president of the Islamic Authority in Austria, opened a conference of imams and religious advisers from across the Continent with the theme of developing a clear identity for European Muslims that can preserve traditions but embrace Western values. The conference also seeks to forge new alliances to confront issues of cultural isolation, youth anger and worries about growing radical movements among Europe's estimated 33 million Muslims.
"The Muslims of Europe want to be an active and central part of the societies they live in," Mr. Schakfeh told the gathering. "They don't want to build a separate and isolated society."
Muslim communities in Europe have been under intense pressure to work with anti-terrorism investigations after the 2004 Madrid train bombings and the blasts last year on London's transit system. European views toward Muslims also hardened after last year's riots in France and the worldwide fallout from caricatures of the prophet Muhammad first published in a Danish newspaper.
The challenge for moderate Muslim leaders is to encourage a brand of Islam that rests comfortably in the West and no longer defines itself solely as extensions of homelands in the Arab world and South Asia, organizers said.
"Muslims can integrate and participate, which is our goal, or remain on the fringes. This is where the danger lies," said Mouddar Khouja, one of the organizers. "We remain Muslim, but our point of reference must be Europe. This is our home."
Some steps have been taken. Centers have been established in France and the Netherlands to train new imams with a European perspective.
But the conference may also look at difficulties in some European nations for Muslim immigrants -- and even their native-born children -- to obtain citizenship. Polls across the European Union, meanwhile, continue to show widespread reservations about potential membership by mostly Muslim Turkey.
Resistance to Turkey's EU bid is among the highest in Austria, which currently holds the presidency of the 25-nation bloc.
"Modern life comes to us without any instructions," Austrian Foreign Minister Ursula Plassnik said. "We must not give in to fundamentalism, radicalism and fatalism. We must promote the voices of moderation."







To: GUSTAVE JAEGER who wrote (283447)4/8/2006 11:47:23 AM
From: longnshort  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1572172
 
Ah, Paris in the spring

By Claude Salhani
April 8, 2006

Once again the French have taken to the streets in protest of a controversial law meant to encourage employers to hire young people without suffering heavy social taxes. And once again Prime Minister Dominique de Villepin's political future becomes less certain with his chances -- and his dreams -- of reaching the Elysee Palace fading along with the smoke from every tear gas grenade.
The First Employment Contract, or CPE, has mobilized the left-wing parties, student unions and often, even the parents and grandparents of those students standing steadfast against the law and the prime minister.
More than a million people have taken to the streets, protesting the law at various times.
The protests spilled into the Parliament as French lawmakers argued over who was running the country. "Who is governing France today?" asked Jean-Marc Ayrault, a socialist lawmaker. Prime Minister de Villepin shot back that the country's institutions were working very much as they should. "Everyone is playing his proper part," said Mr. de Villepin.
France's young people are angered by the law they say treats them like "Kleenex tissues," to be used once and then disposed. The CPE allows employers to dismiss employees under the age of 26 during the first two years of employment without having to justify their action.
The country's youth say it will make them "disposable." The employers and the government argue scrapping the law will reduce employment opportunities. Certainly, the under 26 will have the same rights as anyone one else without the CPE, admits the government. But, they add, without the CPE of course, the young will not be able to get axed so easily because there will be no jobs for them to be hired/fired from.
Many business and political leaders accuse the government of not having properly thought out the law, along with the consequences it would have. Mr. de Villepin had hoped the law would help solve the chronic 26 percent unemployment among French youth, but Laurence Parisot, head of MEDEF, France's country's largest employer federation accused the government of trying to solve its problems on the backs of the young.
Back on the streets tens of thousands of police and gendarme deployed in major French cities to prevent the planned demonstrations turning violent.
Typically, dozens of agitators hang onto the fringes of the demonstrators from where they attack other protesters, stealing purses, cell phones and electronic agendas. Others attack passersby or peaceful demonstrators, break shop windows and generally create havoc for its own sake and to give the demonstrators a bad name. The French call them "Les Casseurs," or those who break.
"What remains of Dominique de Villepin?" asked the conservative Le Figaro. Indeed, for Mr. de Villepin, the man who was never elected to any position, now hopes Matignon, the prime minister's office on the Rue de Varenne, will help him get elected to the Elysee Palace and into the top job in the country: the presidency. But these last few weeks have been more than testing for the prime minister.
For the moment the government is holding steady, not wishing to be seen as capitulating to the demands of the street protesters, although Mr. de Villepin has already said he is willing to discuss changing the existing CPE into a CPE lite, as the French call diet (lite) colas.
Now France's prime minister -- and French President Jacques Chirac's personal protege -- the man Mr. Chirac would like to see replace him as president is starting to have doubts as he faces the "toughest days of his life," says the BBC. The decisions taken by Mr. de Villepin over the next several days may well shape his political future and that of France.
If the prime minister refuses to back down, the protest will continue with students and their parents, supported by trade unionists -- the biggest such demonstrations since the famous May 1968 protests that shook France like a devastating earthquake, forever changing the nation's face.
The same could happen once again, but with summer break now only about two months away, the government knows only too well that the students as well as their parents and grandparents will want to head off for their traditional four weeks summer holiday. The government counts on this sacrosanct tradition to bring life in France back to normal.
On the other hand, the students may decide to pursue their strike, thus surprising the government and putting Paris on track for a long hot summer.

Claude Salhani is international editor for United Press International.



To: GUSTAVE JAEGER who wrote (283447)4/8/2006 12:48:44 PM
From: tejek  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1572172
 
Monoculturism? It sounds like monoescapism to me.......and its happening right over the border from you.

'It just doesn't feel like Holland any more'

Troubled by the changes immigration has brought to their country, the van Ramhorst family is coming to Canada

DOUG SAUNDERS says

Globe and Mail

ROTTERDAM -- To a visitor, the village of Nijkerk looks like a model of Dutch calm and order, its neat streets filled with cyclists and lined with tiny townhouses.

But to Bert van Ramshorst and his family, the town no longer feels like home. Its citizens now come in a variety of hues and hold a wide range of beliefs, some of them deeply at odds with the pacifism and expansive liberalism that has long characterized Dutch society.

"I've lived here, in this town, almost all of my life, and it just doesn't feel like Holland any more," the 42-year-old electrical contractor said, as he took a break from packing to sit with his wife and three young children in their narrow, cozy living room. "It doesn't feel like the place where I want to raise my family."

So the van Ramshorst family, troubled by the changes brought about by immigration, have decided to become immigrants themselves.

With their move to Vancouver this summer, they are joining an unprecedented number of people from the Netherlands who have decided, in recent months, to make a new home in what they see as the more comforting and less divisive Canada.

The sudden exodus to Canada has taken the Dutch government entirely by surprise.

During the past year, and especially during the past five months, the number of Dutch citizens applying to depart for faraway countries -- notably Canada, as well as New Zealand and Australia -- has increased to levels not seen in the tiny nation's modern history.

Most of those emigrants, according to the people who help them make their moves, are leaving because of their complex and surprising feelings about the changes to Dutch society brought about by immigration.

For some, the desire to leave is a response to the immigrants themselves, and what many people here view as their violent, divisive, non-Dutch ways.

But just as many Dutch immigrants seem to be alarmed that immigration has turned their countrymen into angry, intolerant nationalists.

In just about every country in Europe, immigration has become the most significant political issue, by far, in public opinion, media attention and parliamentary action. In Germany, France, Britain and Italy, immigrants have become the dominant election issue.

Faced with shrinking, aging populations and the attendant economic costs, most European countries are badly in need of immigrants. In some countries, this has led to culture shock.

The ethnic cleansing and mass migration of the two world wars left many European countries with one dominant ethnic group, so the presence of large numbers of visibly different people has alarmed and alienated many residents.

Nowhere is this being more strongly felt than in traditionally tolerant, open nations such as Britain and the Netherlands.

While both countries face severe labour shortages and therefore cannot give up on immigration, the public reaction to the demographic changes has been nothing short of fury.

In the campaign leading toward the May 5 national election in Britain, polls show that immigration is by far the most significant issue to voters of all classes and backgrounds -- outpacing by an enormous margin other hot topics such as crime and taxation.

Even the governing left-wing Labour Party has felt compelled to adopt the angry rhetoric of the anti-immigrant right, and has promised to cut back the number of refugees accepted (if not the number of immigrants).

In the Netherlands, the reaction has been equally heated. But there, people are voting with their feet.

"The entire society is changing and people are longing for the world of 20, 30 years ago -- some people believe they can only find that by leaving," says Frans Buysse, a former Canadian embassy employee who runs Holland's largest agency for people wishing to emigrate to Canada.

Mr. Buysse can pinpoint the precise moment when the Dutch outflow became a full-scale flood. On Nov. 2, the libertine filmmaker

Theo van Gogh was murdered in a bloody throat slitting by a Muslim extremist while cycling on an Amsterdam street. To outsiders, it seemed a strange, passing crime. But the Dutch responded, within their tight-knit community, the way some Americans did to the attacks of Sept. 11, 2001.

Suddenly, people were noticing immigrant crimes, and committing crimes against immigrants: December saw the firebombing of several mosques and Islamic schools.

During the next four weeks, Mr. Buysse received 13,000 on-line applications from people requesting information on moving to Canada -- more than four times the usual level. Since then, this increase hasn't stopped. And, he says, the thousands of people he has helped move to Canada during the past few years have mentioned either immigration, or intolerance resulting from immigration, as a reason for leaving.

"For certain people, Nov. 2 was a confirmation of their beliefs," he said. "As a society, we have always been very tolerant to people from other places -- for hundreds of years, this has been the case -- but we have become so tolerant that some groups are influencing society in such a way that it starts to become intolerant. People are fed up with this."

While Dutch emigrants cite numerous reasons for going to Canada, including job opportunities, a desire for adventure, and especially the wide-open spaces that are almost absent from the Netherlands, Mr. Buysse and other immigration workers say it is the tension over immigration that has pushed the emigrant numbers so high recently.

According to the Dutch Central Bureau of Statistics, 49,000 people emigrated last year, the highest number since 1954 and a dramatic increase over approximately 30,000 in 1999.

But the statistics do not reveal the strange and often contradictory motives that are driving away thousands of citizens of the Netherlands, a country that has better standards of health care, education and social services and a lower crime rate than most Canadian cities.

The Dutch, a trading people, have had outsiders in their midst for centuries. And while the past two decades have seen a more open approach to immigration from non-European countries, something about this latest wave has deeply galvanized the country against immigration.

Some blame the Dutch policy of cultural segregation, where groups such as North African Muslims are allowed to attend their own schools and not encouraged to learn the local language or culture. Others blame the simple insularity of Dutch society, which forces newcomers into such enclaves, with little hope of wider acceptance.

For two computer technicians in Rotterdam, the problem has to do not with immigration itself, but with the Dutch response to it. In the view of Ge-An Van Rossum, 36, and her husband, Bas Rijniersce, 29, Canada is a place where the tension between immigrants and non-immigrants does not exist, because that distinction does not exist.

"Canadians are all immigrants," Mr. Rijniersce said from the austere living room of their flat in a funky corner of Rotterdam. "One or two generations back, they all emigrated from somewhere else. But here in the Netherlands there has been quite a lot of problems with this question -- integration doesn't work so well. In Canada it's worked better, though I don't know why. There's a little bit more tolerance between people than there is here."

For Mr. van Ramshorst, the small-town electrician, the problem is simply that Holland has let too many people in without any attention to their ability to fit into Dutch society.

"The last 10 years, our government's policy was to tolerate almost everything, and that's not good," he said. "There's law, and there's respect of the law, and you can't just let people do anything. Tolerance is very important, but we've reached the point where we're tolerating people who despise our way of life and want to damage it."

Those fleeing what they see as a degenerating society face difficulties with Canada's immigration system. Even for the well-educated Dutch, it takes two or three years to get an unsponsored application cleared, a tougher process than most people undergo to get into the Netherlands, although Canada takes far more immigrants, as a proportion of its population, than Holland.

This difficulty has become an inspiration for some in the Netherlands, who blame their country's ad hoc immigration system for the cultural clashes. Some favour adopting the Canadian system wholesale.

"We are only now beginning to understand that now we are an immigrant country, and that we therefore need an immigration law," Mr. Buysse said. "Canada has understood that for a long time, and its points system seems to be a good model for us."

So it may seem surprising, after all the effort and research involved, that both the van Ramshorst and the Van Rossum families have decided to settle in the area immediately around Vancouver. (Dutch immigration consultants say that Alberta and British Columbia are the two most popular destinations.) After all, this is a highly multicultural region that has had its own conflicts over assimilation and intolerance.

But both families said that they don't see this as a problem -- in fact, they see B.C.'s heavy immigrant population as benefiting them, as they, too, will be immigrants.

"There's a different social consensus in Canada," Mr. Rijniersce said. "People are more interested in becoming part of Canadian society, and nobody makes a big deal about their arrival."

Netherlands emigration

An unprecedented number of Dutch citizens are deciding to leave Holland and seek citizenship in Canada to escape what they see as at home.

Dutch-born leaving the country

1995: 38,507
1996: 40,365
1997: 37,849
1998: 35,778
1999: 35,785
2000: 37,414
2001: 39,380
2002: 46,631
2003: 45,946

SOURCE: CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION CANADA, STATISTICS NETHERLANDS
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
wilmott.com



To: GUSTAVE JAEGER who wrote (283447)4/8/2006 1:00:50 PM
From: tejek  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1572172
 
Re: ...I think European countries are still more multiracial monoculture working their way...

Nonsense! You mistake "nationalities" for "races"... Although it was common for 19th-century Europe writers and commentators to write on, and speak of, the French "race", the genius of the British "race", or the foibles of the Slavic "race", it no longer is. Scientifically speaking, the very notion of human races has been debunked and all Europeans --be they French, German, Spanish, Polish,...-- view themselves as one big, happy, white family.


Oh, horse puckey.........what about the Indonesian 'nationality' in Holland........they seem to be scaring off the white Dutchmen who are finding emigration a solution. Oh I see......you don't want to get into the issue of racism because white Europeans are just as racist as their white cousins in America.

Well two can play the same game...........its not Canadians vs Americans...........we are all North Americans.......just one big, white, happy family. See.....Europe has nothing over us.

Re: I still contend that the US has absorbed many more different cultures within its boundaries successfully than Europe has.

I agree. The reason is obvious: most immigrants coming from Europe, Asia and the Middle East, however large their numbers, could never --and still can't-- dream of turning whole US cities and counties into "minority enclaves".


I see.........so that's why the Germans stay predominately in Germany and the French in France........so that's why there are no European enclaves in other European countries. Of course that doesn't change the fact that you all are "one big happy family". One big happy family as long as you stay in your own country. Seems to me you speak with forked tongue, white man. North America's Indians had it right when they first laid eyes on you Europeans.

At best, they can sprawl into little Chinatowns, little Italys, etc. But then, their children will quickly integrate and assimilate into the mainstream monoculture, that is, after one or two generations, they'll speak English at home, go to a (preferably) Judeo-Protestant church, watch football and baseball games, and give up on ever travelling back to where their grandparents came from.... Unfortunately (for your Judeo-Protestant ruling elite, at least), this assimilation recipe doesn't work with Hispanics --and understandably so: Mexico is just a few hours' car-drive away, whole cities harbor Hispanic majorities, Spanish satellite TVs and newspapers make Spanish the US's officious second language....

Yeah, that's right. The success of the American culture has been dependent on assimilation and acculturalization. When that doesn't work, then its a problem.

Somehow, Mexico and Latin America are to the US what (North) Africa is to Europe: successful assimilation relies greatly on the impossibility/difficulty for immigrants to keep in touch with their native countries... I have myself travelled to Canada and the US so I know what it's like to feel thousands of miles away from home. I remember walking along the beach in Santa Monica (LA), I gazed at the sea, the horizon, and thought to myself, "it looks like the North Sea, like Belgium's seafront and yet... it's the Pacific!" When I woke up and had my breakfast, people back home were going to sleep.... nine time zones away. Since most immigrants to the US were not idle rich who could afford to travel back home on vacation, their assimilation has been all the easier.

Some Latinos choose to assimilate. Those we will allow to stay. The rest will have to go back home and make it in their own country.