Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : FREE AMERICA -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: PartyTime who wrote (2480)	4/8/2006 6:28:25 PM
From: Bill	Respond to of 14758

LOL Luckily there is a documented record with advanced search. You had people throwing insults at each other, calling each other chimp, liar, jerk, depraved, hypocrite, stupid, etc. It was an animal house. All sanctioned by you. The day you banned me for two years, I had seven very positive posts about Saddam's downfall and how happy the people in Bagdad were to see our troops come in. In one other, I referenced another poster's hypocrisy. Once. Given the tone of the overall thread, I can only assume you banned me for my pro Bush statements.

To: PartyTime who wrote (2480)	6/12/2007 5:58:17 PM
From: Lazarus_Long	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 14758

Message 23619446 WELL? BTW, maybe the system has changed, but it used to be that Admin worked by MEMBER NUMBER, not by ALIAS. A common result of this for moderators was that, if an alias had been previously used, they couldn't ban a member using a re-used alias because the system would show more than one member # for the alias and couldn't tell which to ban. In that case, the moderator had to PM Admin and ask for the ban. Admin could get at and use the member numbers for banning. How now brown cow? Oh, and Admin could itself release a moderator's ban and one it had made. Wanna try again?