SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: D. Long who wrote (163200)4/9/2006 2:12:14 PM
From: carranza2  Respond to of 793914
 
But I agree with Ralph

Agreed, asolutely.

Any attack has to cripple Iran militarily for the foreseeable future.

There is very litle doubt in my mind that the mullahs will survuve. Nothing will excite a rally behind them like an attack. Think of what we would do ourselves if iran were to attack. Even battered W's popularity would go up.



To: D. Long who wrote (163200)4/9/2006 5:14:18 PM
From: LindyBill  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 793914
 
we should do "Falluja II", not "Falluja I". Really kick them in the teeth.

You would see "'67 II" and '73 II" with the Russians leading the rest of the UN in a demand for a cease fire. We would find out the frustrations the Israelis have lived with.


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News