Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : BABOONS of BAN! -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Lazarus_Long who wrote (78)	4/10/2006 8:34:41 AM
From: epicure	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 186

Ah, the irony. As far as I'm concerned we still have a no to or about which you are not honoring- but I will continue to honor. Now please honor your agreement, since it was your suggestion, and you said you would be bound by it. I have most certainly held up my end of the bargain- though you have repeatedly failed to do so. I haven't commented before, because I was trying to honor my promise even though you were breaking yours (often daily). I won't comment again. You know we had an agreemnt, and you've broken it. If you can honor it in future you will. If you can't, you won't. : To: ionesco who wrote (21003) 5/20/2005 11:39:59 PM From: Lazarus_Long of 21004 Thank you. I was enforcing thread rules as they existed at the time your post was made. Let me mention that they were to prevent EXACTLY the situation you now object to. Let's see if you can actually hold to a "no to or about". You first broke one with me on Sharks, claiming only I was bound by it. Then recently you did the same to Jewel. THAT was what pushed me into relentless pursuit. Since you refused to learn from logic, I decided I would drive the point home - HARD. Goodbye. Message 21348327 Message 21348555 Message 21348656